Abstract:Abstract Background The performance evaluation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is crucial for enhancing the quality of public health services. With the ongoing reform of the CDC system in China, the existing performance evaluation system faces challenges. This study used the Delphi method to develop a new performance evaluation system for China’s provincial, city, and county-level CDC. Methods Following the “Structure-Process-Outcome” model, assessment indicators were systematically collected. Indicators were modified and screened through two Delphi rounds based on CDC responsibilities, health development, and national policies. Twenty-four experts provided ratings and recommendations, and the research team evaluated questionnaire reliability, expert positivity, expert authority, and opinion consistency. Results The preliminary index system identified through the literature review and pre-survey included 11 primary, 30 secondary, and 64 tertiary indicators. After the first round of consultation, two secondary indicators and 11 tertiary indicators were removed and 22 tertiary indicators were added. After the second round of consultation, three secondary indicators and 11 tertiary indicators were removed and three tertiary indicators were added, at which point the p -value of the test for Kendall’s coefficient of concordance W was < 0.001 and the coefficient of variation was within acceptable limits (< 0.25), so the consultation was concluded. The final index system included 11 primary, 25 secondary, and 67 tertiary indicators. Conclusions This study responded to the CDC system reform by developing a comprehensive performance evaluation index system for provincial, city, and county-level CDC in China. The index system is both scientifically grounded and practical, serving as an effective tool for promoting the high-quality work of CDC organizations.

Analyzing the Performance Evaluation Results of the Provincial Disease Control and Prevention System

The Performance and Results Analysis on the Primary Prevention and Healthcare System in Longgang,Shenzhen

Performance assessment of provincial disease control and prevention system(2) :general information of performance of centers for disease control and prevention

Performance Assessment of Provincial Disease Control and Prevention System(1):General Information of Regions

Performance assessment for provincial disease control and prevention system(13):health education and health promotion have been widely carried out

Performance Assessment for Provincial Disease Control and Prevention System (7) : Significant Improvement of Communicable Disease Control and Immunization Planning

Performance Assessment for Provincial Disease Control and Prevention System(12) : Laboratory Testing Ability is Improved

Developing the Performance Evaluation Indicator System of Disease Control and Prevention System in China

Performance Assessment for Provincial Disease Control and Prevention System(14) : the Technical Guidance to the Primary Level Was Highly Emphasized, but the Application Research Needed to Be Inproved

The development of a performance evaluation index system for Chinese Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: a Delphi consensus study

Performance evaluation of township hospitals in Guangzhou area

Building the Framework of Performance Evaluation for Disease Control and Prevention System in China

Brief introduction of "Research and Practice on Performance Evaluation of Disease Control and Prevention System in China"

Brief Introduction of the Performance Evaluation Indicator System on Institutions for Disease Control and Prevention in China

Performance Assessment for Provincial Disease Control and Prevention System(11):Information Management Has Been Strengthened,but Information Network Needs Urgent Improvement

Performance Assessment for Provincial Disease Control and Prevention System( 10): the Disposal Ability of Public Health Emergencies Has Been Improved, While the Public Health Emergency Reserves Were Inadequate

Performance Assessment of Provincial Disease Control and Prevention System(3):The Quality of Staff is Developedbut Team Structure is Still Unreasonable

Improvement of Ideas to Develop the Nethodology and Practice of the Performance Evaluation for Disease Control and Prevention System

Developing the Information Platform of Performance Evaluation of the Disease Control and Prevention System

The Reserch on the Evaluation System for Community Health Service Centers

Study on Development of Evaluation Indicator System of Public Health Service System