Strengths,shortcomings and Key Control Points of Capacity-Building in Hypertension Prevention and Control:A Comparative Analysis among Provincial-Level Administrative Divisions in China
WANG Lan,YU Qinwen,WANG Xin,SHI Peiwu,SHEN Qunhong,CHEN Zheng,PU Chuan,XU Lingzhong,HU Zhi,MA Anning,XU Tianqiang,WANG Panshi,WANG Hua,HAO Chao,ZHOU Qingyu,HAO Mo,LI Chengyue
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11847/zgggws1140772
2023-01-01
Abstract:ObjectiveTo evaluate the capacity for hypertension prevention and control and to identify strengths, shortcomings and key control points of the capacity-building in 31 provincial-level administrative divisions (PLADs) in China.MethodsPolicy documents, information reports, and research literature on hypertension prevention and control in 31 PLADs of China published from January 1995 through December 2019 were systemically collected via searching relevant websites and statistical yearbooks for evaluating on hypertension prevention and control capacity across the 31 PLADs according to the standards for appropriate public health system. Normative gap analysis was used to explore strengths and shortcomings of the capacity-building and multiple linear regression and sensitivity analysis were used to clarify key control points of the capacity-building. ResultsThe average index for the appropriateness of hypertension prevention and control capacity-building was 47.10% among 31 PLADs of China in 2019, and the average annual increasing rate of the capacity-building was 18.75% from 2000 to 2019, showing a significant upward trend (Z = 6.067, P < 0.001). The strengths of hypertension prevention and control capacity-building for the PLADs include more complete organizational structure established, comprehensive coverage of medium- and long-term plans, and sound management and monitoring mechanisms; while the shortcomings are insufficient allocation of human and financial resources and low implementation of multi-dimensional management mechanisms such as management and coordination, medium- and long-term goals and evaluation criteria. The identified key control points for the five aspects in hypertension prevention and control capacity-building are effective motivation of personnel for resource allocation, the coordination for organizational framework, the coverage of incentive measures for management mechanism, practicable assessment criteria for management process evaluation, and the balance between supply and demand of medical service for service offering, with the estimated increment of 23.14%, 66.40%, 15.77%, 23.43% and 7.06%, respectively, in the indexes for the appropriateness of the capacity-building under the conditions of the five key control points being well managed. ConclusionThe capacity for hypertension prevention and control has been improved continuously in 31 PLADs of China during 2000 – 2019 but several aspects in hypertension prevention and control capacity-building still need to be improved for the promotion of the capacity-building.