Application Effects Comparison and Nursing Interventions of Two Drainage Systems for Patients after Skin Slap Transplantation

Chen Haiyan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2013.16.026
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the application effects of central continuing negative pressure drainage plus irrigation technology with the disposable negative pressure ball drainage device after skin flap transplantation,so as to summarize the pertinent nursing strategies.Methods By convenience sampling,totally84patients with skin flap transplantation were recruited and divided into experimental group and control group according to the admission number.Patients in the experimental group were given central continuing negative pressure drainage plus irrigation technology,while patients in the control group were given disposable negative pressure drainage device.Incidence of tube blockage,subcutaneous hydrops,skin flap necrosis,and delayed incision healing were compared between the two groups.Results One case of tubing blockage happened in the experimental group while six tubing blockages,7subcutaneous hydrops,5skin flap necrosis and 8delayed incision healing were detected in the control group,and the differences were significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The central continuing negative pressure drainage plus irrigation technology is defined to be an effective method not only in preventing skin flap transplantation from tube blockage,skin flap necrosis and subcutaneous hydrops but also in reducing the incidence of delayed incision healing,therefore facilitates the survival of grafted skin flaps.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?