Abstract:Background Post-parotidectomy wound dressing techniques lack of robust evidence, creating variation in practice. The choice between conventional and pressure dressing is typically based on expert opinions and individual preferences and the anticipated benefits of reduced drainage and shorter drain retention in pressure dressing hasn't demonstrate yet. Purpose The purpose of this study is to assess the advantage of pressure dressing following parotidectomy compared to conventional dressing. Study design, setting, sample This study was a open-label randomized controlled trial recruiting the patients aged 18 and above undergoing parotidectomy at the Otolaryngology Department of King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital between March 2021 and September 2022. Our exclusion criteria were as following: (1) underwent parotidectomy combined with neck dissection, (2) prior irradiation to the parotid gland or head and neck region, (3) prior parotidectomy within the previous year, (4) consumption of anticholinergic medications, (5) bleeding disorders or coagulopathies. Predictor/exposure/independent variable The predictor variable was postoperative dressing and subjects were randomly assigned to pressure or conventional dressing Main outcome variable(s) The primary outcome variables were drain output (ml) measured every 8 hours and reported in the term of total drain output and duration of drain use. The secondary outcome variables were post-parotidectomy complications (if any), complications from the pressure dressing and pain scores. Covariates The covariates were underlying disease, smoking, alcohol drinking, types of parotidectomy (extension of surgery) and pathologic result. Analyses The appropriate uni- and bivariate statistics were computed, and the level of statistical significance was set at P-value < 0.05. Results A total of 40 patients were enrolled, with 20 in each group. Average age was 59.10±10.60 years in pressure dressing group and 55.70±18.90 years in conventional dressing group. Baseline characteristics were the same in both groups. The average volume of drain output in the pressure dressing group was 44.25 ± 25.20 ml, compared to 37.05 ± 22.74 ml in the conventional dressing group (p = 0.34). Moreover, the average duration of drain placement for the pressure dressing group was 27.65 ± 9.86 hours, while it was 26.90 ± 11.23 hours for the conventional group (p = 0.83). Notably, there were no significant differences between the two groups regarding sialocele and pain scores. Furthermore, no complications from the application of pressure dressing were observed. Conclusions and Relevance Pressure dressing does not provide significant benefits over conventional dressing after parotidectomy concerning drain output, duration of drain placement, or surgical complications.

A Comparative Study on Post-parotidectomy between Negative Pressure Drainage and Positive Pressure Drainage

[A prospective randomized and controlled study on no drainage after surgery for benign thyroid disorders]

Total endoscopic thyroidectomy versus conventional open thyroidectomy in thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Drainage after total thyroidectomy or lobectomy for benign thyroidal disorders

Is routine drainage necessary after thyroid surgery? A randomized controlled trial study

Drains in thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Are they necessary?

To drain or not to drain in thyroid surgery. A controlled clinical study

Study on the Application of A New Type of Anhydrous Thoracic Negative Pressure Drainage Device in Patients after Thoracic Surgery

Drain vs. no drain in primary thyroid and parathyroid surgery

Utility of Applying Pressure Dressing Following Parotidectomy Compared to Conventional Dressing: A Benefit or Not?

To drain or not to drain following thyroidectomy.: A prospective, randomized study

Thyroid Surgery: To Drain or Not to Drain, That Is the Problem - A Randomized Clinical Trial

The impact of routine open nonsuction drainage on fluid accumulation after thyroid surgery: a prospective randomised clinical trial

Is the routine drainage after surgery for thyroid necessary? A prospective randomized clinical study [ISRCTN63623153]

Systematic review and meta-analysis of wound drains after thyroid surgery

[Connection between the type of drainage and sepsis in thyroid surgery]

Practice variations, trends, and outcomes of drain use in thyroidectomy: A NSQIP study

Could post-thyroidectomy bleeding be the clue to modify the concept of postoperative drainage? A prospective randomized controlled study

A randomised controlled trial of routine suction drainage after elective thyroid and parathyroid surgery with ultrasound evaluation of fluid collection

Clinical Use of a Drain Incision Placed below and Bilaterial to Near Total Thyroidectomy Incision

[Gravity or suction drainage in thyroid surgery? Control of efficacy with ultrasound determination of residual hematoma]