Authoritarian State And Contentious Politics

Dingxin Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68930-2_25

2010-01-01

Abstract: The modern state has taken much power (in taxation, law, welfare and war-making, etc) away from the local communities and is increasingly relevant to people's lives (Howard 1976; Mann 1986; Tilly 1992). The more a state gains power over the people, the more its presence is felt by the people. Revolution and social movement can thus be seen as people's attempt to harness the increasingly powerful state or to use the state to advance sectarian interests (Bright and Harding 1984; Tilly 1975, 1978, 1986; Tilly et al. 1975). The state plays a more important role in shaping the contentious politics under authoritarian regimes than in democracies. Authoritarian states tend to exert greater control over people's lives and politicize the matters under their control. Most authoritarian states are also less developed and tend to play a more active role in economic development (Evans 1995; Gershenkron 1952; Migdal 1994; Wade 1990; Zhao and Hall 1994), which often generates state-centered grievances. The policies of authoritarian states are more likely to be predatory due to the lack of efficient bureaucracy and democratic politics. The sense of injustice tends to be much stronger among the people under an authoritarian state than in a democracy.