State Legitimacy, State Policy, and the Development of the 1989 Beijing Student Movement

Dingxin Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.1999.0032

1999-01-01

Asian Perspective

Abstract:During the 1989 Beijing Student Movement, the Chinese government changed its policies back and forth from concession to repression. The changes were commonly explained as outcomes of struggles between reformers and conservatives in the government. This paper argues that while the existence of power struggles among top state elites is a truism, the key factor underlying these state policy changes was the ineffectiveness of the previous state policy in dealing with the movement. The logic of my argument is that each state control measure needs a legitimacy base to be effective. During the 1980s, while the majority of top state elites still believed in the regime’s ideological legitimacy, most students and Beijing residents evaluated the state mainly based on its economic and moral performance. During the movement, the students challenged the government morally and ideologically, and urban residents widely sympathized with the challenge. On the other hand, the government relied on either ideological or legal dimensions of the state authority to deal with the movement, which only antagonized people, or on a limited concession to contain an essentially “disloyal opposition,” which could not satisfy the radicals. In the end, the only viable alternative appeared to be military repression, which the government could still rely on because most top state elites including military leaders had joined the Chinese Communist Party between 1920s and 1940s and still perceived the state power as ideologically legitimate.