The Influence on 1H-MRS of Liver Lesion with Processing Methods by Probe and Spectrum Post Processing

郑淑梅,刘爱连,汪禾青,张婷

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2013.05.034

2013-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare the difference in the 1 H-MRS images of detected metabolites of liver lesion by using probe and spectrum postprocessing methods.Methods 1 H-MRS of liver lesions in 52 cases including the hemangioma of the liver(16),23 cases of hepatocellularcarcinoma and liver metastases(13) confirmed clinically and pathologically were analyzed retrospectively using breathing trigger technology,the spectrum acquisition time was three minutes and 15 seconds.The original images were processed respectively with probe and spectrum methods.The peak heights and the area under the peaks after selecting the metabolites wave manually(about 0.05 error) were calculated by software,and the differences of every peak height and the area under the peak were observed.Results The appearance rate of the peak of 1.3 ppm and 3.2 ppm was depicted 100% by the probe postprocessing,while the other wave peaks(0.9 ppm,2.0 ppm,2.8 ppm,3.6-3.9 ppm)were not constantly appeared.The differences of peak heights in three groups of 3.2 ppm peak had statistic significance(P=0.017),while the differences of peak heights between liver hemangioma group and hepatocellular carcinoma group,liver hemangioma group and liver metastases group had statistical significance(P=0.032,P=0.019).2.8 ppm peak had no appear in liver hemangioma group.The differences of the areas under the peaks in three groups of 3.2 ppm peak had statistic significance(P=0.023),and the differences of the areas under the peaks between liver hemangioma group and hepatocellular carcinoma group had statistic significance(P=0.037);2.8ppm peak had no appear in liver hemangioma group.The method of spectrum postprocessing mainly showed 4.7 ppm and 1.3 ppm peak,and the appearance rate of them were 100%.3.2 ppm peak was not constantly appeared;The differences of peak heights in three groups of 3.2 ppm peak had statistical significance(P=0.022),while the differences of peak heights between liver hemangioma group and hepatocellular carcinoma group had statistical significance(P=0.035).The differences of the area under the peaks in three groups of peak 3.2 ppm had statistic significance(P=0.041),and the differences of the areas under the peaks between liver hemangioma group and hepatocellular carcinoma group had statistical significance(P=0.028);The differences of the areas under the peaks 4.7 ppm compared between liver hemangioma group and liver metastases group had statistical significance(P=0.014).Conclusion The method of probe and spectrum postprocessing can show different numbers of the peaks,the statistical results of 3.2 ppm peaks were consistent in hepatocellular carcinoma group and liver hemangioma group.With the analysis of ROC diagram,it can provide better sensitivity using spectrum postprocessing than using probe postprocessing in diagnosis of the hepatocellular carcinoma.