Abstract:There is mounting evidence that many taxa respond in non‐linear ways to perturbation (i.e. deviations from a natural trajectory brought on by an external agent), and many statistical, physical and ecological methods have been developed to detect the critical points or thresholds of perturbation. The majority of these methods define thresholds as the perturbation points causing abrupt ecological response, but in reality most species or ecosystems do not show a break point response but more gradual transitional change to perturbation. We develop a new method which delineates thresholds as a region in which the slope of the relationship between ecological response (y) and perturbation (x; e.g. habitat loss) is larger than 1: |dy/dx|≥ 1, where both x‐ and y‐axes are scaled to (0, 1) range. The lower end of threshold zones so defined is of particular ecological interest because it is the smallest x that may trigger impending catastrophic response to a small change in x. We derived two landscape models (edge length and the number of patches of species distribution) and two biodiversity models (endemics–area relationship and half‐population curve) to test this method. We applied our zonal thresholding method to these four models fit to empirical data of two forest plots to detect thresholds of species distribution to habitat loss. The two landscape metric models predict that no species could tolerate more than 40% of habitat loss and these thresholds can be much lower for relatively rare species with occupancy < 0.4 and for aggregated habitat loss compared to random habitat loss. The half‐population model leads to a similar threshold level of 40% habitat loss. Overall, we suggest the maximum permissible habitat loss threshold to be between 0–40%, depending on the pre‐disturbed occupancy (or abundance) of a species. This habitat loss threshold falls within the otherwise wide range of thresholds calculated from conventional methods. Our study contributes novel methods and models to quantify the effect of habitat loss on species distribution and diversity in landscapes with potential for conservation applications.

How Species Diversity Responds to Different Kinds of Human-Caused Habitat Destruction

Responses of Metapopulation Dynamics to Two Different Kinds of Habitat Destruction Caused by Human Activities

The mechanism of species extinction under habitat destruction at different rates

Species Diversity under Effects of Temporal Heterogeneity of Habitat Destruction

Responsive Mechanism of Species Extinction to the Habitat Destruction at Different Time Scales

Response of metapopulation dynamics to the temporal-spatial heterogeneity of habitat destruction

Complex nonmonotonic responses of biodiversity to habitat destruction

Does Habitat Restoration Cause Species Extinction?

Extinction of Poorest Competitors and Temporal Heterogeneity of Habitat Destruction

The Ecological Order of Persisting Species During Habitat Destruction

Metapopulation Dynamics Response to the Spatial Heterogeneity of Habitat Destruction

Can Best Competitors Avoid Extinction As Habitat Destruction?

The competition model of species at different types of habitat and simulation studies and applications

Responses of Exotic Invasions With Different Competitive Abilities to Habitat Destruction

Indirect effects of habitat destruction on model ecosystems

Interactive Effects of Habitat Destruction and Competition on Exotic Invasion

Simulating Unintended Effects Restoration

Apparent Competition of Predator' S Preference to Prey under Different Habitat Destruction Patterns: A Simulation Analysis

From habitat decline to collapse: a spatially explicit approach connecting habitat degradation to destruction

RETRACTED: Biomass Energy Flow Between Species and Species Survival in Fragmented Landscapes

Methods and Models for Identifying Thresholds of Habitat Loss