Abstract:Aim Habitat conversion is the number one threat to biodiversity. The loss of biodiversity due to habitat loss might be exacerbated if species are harmed by fragmentation per se—the breaking apart of natural habitat that remains (hereafter fragmentation). However, the evidence that species are harmed by habitat fragmentation is mixed. Studies at the patch scale tend to show that fragmentation reduces diversity due to negative demographic effects on species' dispersal, survival and fecundity. In contrast, studies at the landscape scale tend to show that fragmentation increases diversity. This discrepancy may be partly due to geometric effects, defined as greater species turnover between patches in more fragmented landscapes. Although these effects have been demonstrated theoretically and are expected to be stronger across larger spatial extents, it is unclear whether they are likely to occur in real‐world settings with both realistic landscape patterns and communities. Here, we investigated the possibility of geometric effects using simulations combined with real‐world landscape and community data. Location New Jersey, northeastern USA. Time period Current. Taxa studied Bees. Methods We focused on landscape sizes within the typical range for protected areas (36–576 ha), simulated forest loss using real landscape patterns, and simulated forest‐bee communities based on field data we collected. Results We found weak but positive effects of fragmentation: immediately following forest destruction, the most fragmented forests harboured up to 7.3% more species than the least fragmented forests of the same area, in agreement with observational studies of biodiversity along fragmentation gradients. In contrast to expectations, however, the overall effects of fragmentation did not change with spatial extent. Conclusions Our results suggest that fragmentation can mitigate biodiversity loss immediately following habitat destruction, but that the benefits do not vary strongly with spatial extent in real‐world landscapes and at extents relevant to land management.

Complex nonmonotonic responses of biodiversity to habitat destruction

Habitat amount modulates biodiversity responses to fragmentation

How Species Diversity Responds to Different Kinds of Human-Caused Habitat Destruction

Landscape fragmentation overturns classical metapopulation thinking

Complex interactive responses of biodiversity to multiple environmental drivers

Responses of Metapopulation Dynamics to Two Different Kinds of Habitat Destruction Caused by Human Activities

The mechanism of species extinction under habitat destruction at different rates

Metapopulation Dynamics Response to the Spatial Heterogeneity of Habitat Destruction

Response of metapopulation dynamics to the temporal-spatial heterogeneity of habitat destruction

Robustness of Metacommunities with Omnivory to Habitat Destruction: Disentangling Patch Fragmentation from Patch Loss.

Species diversity and habitat fragmentation per se: The influence of local extinctions and species clustering

Species Diversity under Effects of Temporal Heterogeneity of Habitat Destruction

Habitat loss alters effects of intransitive higher-order competition on biodiversity: a new metapopulation framework

Complex effects of habitat amount and fragmentation on functional connectivity and inbreeding in a giant panda population

Habitat Fragmentation and Biodiversity Conservation: Key Findings and Future Challenges

Decoupling Species Richness Variation and Spatial Turnover in Beta Diversity Across a Fragmented Landscape

Indirect effects of habitat destruction on model ecosystems

Geometric effects of fragmentation are likely to mitigate diversity loss following habitat destruction in real‐world landscapes

Responses of Insect Communities and Populations on Habitat Fragmentation in Grassland Landscapes

Does Habitat Restoration Cause Species Extinction?

Geometric and demographic effects explain contrasting fragmentation-biodiversity relationships across scales