Geometric and demographic effects explain contrasting fragmentation-biodiversity relationships across scales

Stav Gelber,Shane A. Blowes,Jonathan M. Chase,Andreas Huth,Frank M. Schurr,Britta Tietjen,Julian W. Zeller,Felix May

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.01.577731

2024-02-02

Abstract:There is consensus that habitat loss is a major driver of biodiversity loss, while the effects of fragmentation, given a constant total habitat amount, are still debated. Here, we use a process-based metacommunity model to show how strongly scale- and context-dependent fragmentation-biodiversity relationships can emerge from the interplay of two types of fragmentation effects - geometric and demographic. Geometric effects arise from the spatial distribution of species and landscape modification, whereas demographic effects reflect long-term changes in species demographic rates following landscape modification. We introduce a novel approach to partitioning these two types of effects and assess how key ecological processes and factors, such as dispersal, habitat heterogeneity, and edge effects, influence geometric, demographic, and net fragmentation effects across spatial scales. We conclude that the framework of geometric and demographic effects can reconcile previous apparently conflicting results and hopefully unlock and advance the debate on biodiversity change in modified landscapes.

Ecology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper discusses the relationship between biodiversity and habitat fragmentation, particularly how it is manifested at different scales and contexts. The researchers demonstrate two types of fragmentation effects - geometric effects and demographic effects - and how they strongly depend on scale and context. Geometric effects are caused by the spatial distribution of species and landscape modifications, while demographic effects reflect the long-term changes in species population dynamics after landscape alterations.

The paper points out that although habitat loss has a negative impact on biodiversity, the effects of fragmentation alone (without considering total quantity reduction) are still debated. The researchers propose that these contradictory results may partially originate from inappropriate comparisons between studies conducted at different scales. They emphasize the scale and context dependence of fragmentation impacts and propose a new approach to distinguish between these two effects.

In their study, they analyze how key ecological processes (such as dispersal, habitat heterogeneity, and edge effects) influence the manifestation of geometric, demographic, and net fragmentation effects at different spatial scales. The paper demonstrates that by decomposing these effects, seemingly contradictory research results can be reconciled, and it can contribute to advancing discussions on biodiversity changes in transformed landscapes.

Furthermore, the paper introduces a novel method to separate geometric and demographic effects from biodiversity time series to investigate if they are associated with the same or different processes. This method enhances the understanding of biodiversity responses to fragmentation and improves predictions of scale-dependent biodiversity changes.

In conclusion, the paper aims to address the complex relationship between biodiversity and habitat fragmentation, especially at different scales and contexts, and to differentiate and analyze the impacts of geometric and demographic effects on this relationship.