Abstract:Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. As global biodiversity is rapidly declining due to habitat loss, it is important to determine how to protect it. The policies of many conservation agencies are still prioritizing the preservation of a single large habitat area (SL) versus several small areas of the same size (SS), despite empirical support favouring SS. However, to date, while many studies have explored this issue using model communities, the results are mixed. In competitive community models, fragmentation has a negative effect at low habitat amounts, whereas neutral community models suggest positive effects. This work aims to explore spatial multispecies models to verify the SS > SL pattern and determine its causes. We used three types of models: a classical neutral, neutral with habitat selection and a competitive hierarchical model. All models have three parameters, namely extinction, reproduction and dispersal distance. In the classical neutral model, species are equivalent and have the same parameters; when there is a reproduction event, they send the propagule to a surrounding patch blindly, and if the patch is already occupied, the propagule dies. In the neutral with habitat selection model, the propagules select an empty patch, so their survival is ensured. In the hierarchical model, species have competitive dominance and more dominant ones can replace the less dominant with a replacement rate parameter. We use 100 species and start simulating the colonization of an empty area; then, we destroy a fixed amount of habitat using different regular patch sizes. The results for all models are almost always that SS retains more species than SL. The extinction of species in patches depends on the quotient between reproduction and extinction rates in relation to patch size. The only case when SL > SS is when dispersal is insufficient to connect patches, and patch size is smaller than the minimum to prevent extinction. If patch size is above the critical size to maintain local populations, the SS > SL pattern is due to the sampling effect of aggregated species distribution combined with the reduction of dispersal ability of species. High‐dispersal rates produce the homogenization of species distribution and a reduction of species richness and this is why habitat fragmentation by habitat loss retains more species when patches are smaller. The model predicts that if a set of species have more dispersal capabilities, the SS effect would be lower than for species with less dispersal. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Species diversity and habitat fragmentation per se: The influence of local extinctions and species clustering

Solving the SLoSS debate: Scale-dependent effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity loss

Assessing Habitat Fragmentation’s Hierarchical Effects on Species Diversity at Multiple Scales: the Case of Thousand Island Lake, China

Habitat Fragmentation Affects Richness—A View Through a Metacommunity Lens

Geometric and demographic effects explain contrasting fragmentation-biodiversity relationships across scales

Is habitat fragmentation bad for biodiversity?

Landscape fragmentation overturns classical metapopulation thinking

Why there are more species in several small patches versus few large patches: A multispecies modelling approach

The influence of fragmented landscapes on speciation

Habitat Fragmentation and Biodiversity Conservation: Key Findings and Future Challenges

Geometric effects of fragmentation are likely to mitigate diversity loss following habitat destruction in real‐world landscapes

The Effects of Landscape Variables on the Species-Area Relationship During Late-Stage Habitat Fragmentation.

Complex nonmonotonic responses of biodiversity to habitat destruction

Habitat amount modulates biodiversity responses to fragmentation

Quantifying Effects of Habitat Heterogeneity and Other Clustering Processes on Spatial Distributions of Tree Species

Decoupling Species Richness Variation and Spatial Turnover in Beta Diversity Across a Fragmented Landscape

Dispersal limitation and weaker stabilizing mechanisms mediate loss of diversity with edge effects in forest fragments

Extinction filters mediate the global effects of habitat fragmentation on animals

Metapopulation Dynamics Response to the Spatial Heterogeneity of Habitat Destruction

Intermediate Fragmentation Per Se Provides Stable Predator-Prey Metapopulation Dynamics

Contrasting Patterns of Species Richness and Functional Diversity in Bird Communities of East African Cloud Forest Fragments