The "Cross Phenomenon" of Evolution of Law --An Observation About Dingliches Rechtsgeschaeft and Article 51 of the Contract Act
王冠玺
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-2397.2005.01.025
2005-01-01
Abstract:Since the “ cross phenomenon” is generally ignored in the evolution of law in China, it seems for certain that the Dingliches Rechtsgeschaeft (a German method related to the conveyance of real property) will not be introduced in the proposed Civil Code. Instead, a relevant French model (“ doctrine of ideas” ) will play a major role in the conveyance of real properties, with delivery and registration as supplementary requirements. However, such a framework would hardly be an ideal one. Since this issue is of the utmost importance, it is advisable for us all to discuss it more thoroughly before any decision regarding whether or not to adopt the French doctrine is made. Apart from theoretical observation and illustration by way of decided cases, this paper also makes some comments on Article 51 of the Contract Act. Furthermore, This paper introduces and makes comments on the academic views against the introduction of Dingliches Rechtsgeschaeft in the Civil Code and illustrates the merits and drawbacks of different regimes. At the same time, the conveyance of real property under the “ doctrine of ideas” is also discussed, which concerns with different conveyance methods, including French method, Japanese method and ways found by Chinese scholars. At last, this author, by means of methodology of economic analysis, highlights the potential transaction costs under the circumstances where Dingliches Rechtsgeschaeft were adopted or not adopted, as well as the transaction cost where Article 51 of the Contract Act takes effect, hoping that it may well justify the introduction of Dingliches Rechtsgeschaeft into China's Civil Code.