On the analytical vs.synthetic approaches in linguistic research

LI Yafei
2006-01-01
Abstract:This paper examines the methodology in linguistic research,noting that"divide-and-conquer", though a fruitful and arguably necessary approach to complex problems due to its ability to produce accuracy and detail,is also the culprit for many theoretical debates that are unnecessarily time-and resource-consuming.Via two specific examples,the debates on the syntax-morphology interface and the nature of temporal iconicity,it argues that it is beneficial to the field for the researchers to be truly aware of the limitations of the divide-and-conquer method.It shows that apparently opposing views may in fact be complementary to each other and that the best solution to a long-lasting controversy may simply lie in combining the valid elements of both sides.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?