Evaluation of three methods for testing yeasts susceptibility to fluconazole

LIU Jin-yan,XIANG Ming-jie,ZHANG Hua,CHEN Hua,NI Yu-xing
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the reliability and feasibility of three testing methods for assessing the effectiveness of fluconazole against isolates of yeast (n=82) in vitro. Methods ROSCO disk diffusion method and ATB FUNGUS 3 method were compared with the reference CLSI M44-A disk diffusion method for assessing the effectiveness of fluconazole against 82 yeasts isolated clinically. The relationship among the three methods was analyzed with WHONET- 5.4 and SPSS 13.0 software. Results There were no statistical differences between the results of ROSCO disk diffusion method and the results of CLSI M44-A disk diffusion method (P>0.05), the concordance rate was 80.5%. The results of ATB FUNGUS 3 test were statistically different from the results of CLSI M44-A disk diffusion method (P<0.01) and the concordance rate was 74.4%, especially the test results of Candida glabrata and Candida albicans. Conclusions ROSCO disk diffusion method shows the better agreement with M44-A disk diffusion method. Some of the yeast isolates needs CLSI M27-A2 broth microdilution method further for determining minimum inhibition concentration (MIC).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?