Levofloxacin susceptibility testing for Helicobacter pylori in China: comparison of E-test and disk diffusion method.

Chaohui Yu,Lan Li,Wenguo Chen,Yangwen Jiao,Ningmin Yang,En Yang,Jianzhong Zhang,Lihua Chen,Youming Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-5378.2011.00820.x
2011-01-01
Helicobacter
Abstract:Background: The aims of this study were to compare disk diffusion with E-test method for levofloxacin susceptibility testing of Helicobacter pylori and standardized breakpoints for disk diffusion as a stable and reliable method for determining qualitative levofloxacin susceptibility. Materials and Methods: We determined the levofloxacin susceptibility of 45 H. pylori strains isolated from Chinese patients by the E-test method. Disk diffusion was evaluated as an alternative method to determine susceptibility and compared with the E-test results by linear regression analysis. Results: The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values tested by E-test method ranged from 0.047 to 32 mu g/mL. Resistance to levofloxacin was detected in 16 (35.6%) isolates. The levofloxacin disk zone sizes obtained by disk diffusion method correlated well (r2 = .877) with the MICs obtained by E-test method. As a consequence of regression analysis, isolates with inhibition diameters < 12 mm were considered resistant to levofloxacin. There was 100% agreement between the two methods for levofloxacin, applying the regression-based breakpoints. Conclusions: The disk diffusion method is equivalent to the E-test method for testing levofloxacin susceptibility of H. pylori strains; it is more practical and inexpensive, and it is suitable for the analysis of a small number of isolates compared with the E-test method.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?