Evaluation of Etests and the disk diffusion method for assessment of the activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in China

Qi Wang,Feifei Zhang,Zhanwei Wang,Hongbin Chen,Xiaojuan Wang,Yawei Zhang,Shuguang Li,Hui Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-26430/v1
2020-01-01
Abstract:Abstract Background: Gram-negative bacilli, particularly Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, often acquire antimicrobial resistance. Ceftazidime-avibactam was approved for use in China in 2019. However, currently available commercial antimicrobial susceptibility test kits have not yet been developed. Here, we evaluated the Etest and disk diffusion method for assessment of the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam against Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa in China. Results: In total, 194 Enterobacterales and 77 P. aeruginosa isolates, which were divided into a random selection group (140 Enterobacterales and 54 P. aeruginosa isolates) and a stock group (46 Enterobacterales and 31 P. aeruginosa isolates), were assessed by the Etest, disk diffusion, and broth microdilution (BMD) methods. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and zone diameters were interpreted according to the CLSI M100 30th edition. For all 271 Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates, no very major errors were found using Etests. The overall categorical agreement rates (CA%) of Etests for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa were 99.5% (193/194) and 96.1% (74/77), respectively. The overall essential agreement rates (EA%) of Etests for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa were 95.9% (186/194) and 94.8% (73/77), respectively. In both the random selection and stock groups, EA% and CA% values of Etests exceeded 90%. Overall CA% values of the disk diffusion method for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa were 98.5% (191/194) and 93.5% (71/77), respectively. There was no linear relationship between zone diameter and BMD MIC. Conclusions: For Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa, Etests and the disk diffusion method could have better performance as alternative methods to meet the needs of clinical treatment interpretation. Application of the disk diffusion method in Enterobacterales was superior to that in P. aeruginosa.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?