Comparative evaluation of ATB FUNGUS 2 procedure and CLSI M27-A2 broth microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida species and Cryptococcus neoformans

LIU Wei,WAN Zhe,LI Ruo-yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-3827.2008.06.004
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the availability of ATB FUNGUS 2 method to determine the susceptibility of Candida spp.and Cryptococcus neoformans to four common antifungal drugs(amphotericin B,flucytosine,fluconazole,and itraconazole).Methods The ATB FUNGUS 2 method was compared with the reference standard broth microdilution test,the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute(CLSI,formerly NCCLS)M27-A2 guidelines,by determining the in vitro susceptibilities of 131 isolates of Candida spp.(including 68 FLC-susceptible C.albicans isolates,10 FLC-dose-dependent C.albicans isolates,5 FLC-resistant C.albicans isolates,10 C.krusei,10 C.glabrata,10 C.tropicalis,10 C.parapsilosis,5 C.guilliermondii,3 C.dublinensis)and 20 isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans to the 4 antifungal drugs.Results ①Ninety-eight percent agreements between the two methods for amphotericin B,89.4% for flucytosine,78.8% for fluconazole,and 78.1% for itraconazole were appeared.②The overall agreement between the two methods exceeded 80% for all strains tested.③The ATB FUNGUS 2 method misclassified as susceptible or dose-dependent susceptible 2 of 5 fluconazole-resistant isolates,and misclassified as susceptible or resistant 8 of 10 fluconazole-dose-dependent isolates of C.albicans.④The MICs range of amphotericin B in ATB FUNGUS 2 procedure was too high to get the exact numerical value.Conclusion ATB FUNGUS 2 procedure is a rapid,simple,and reproducible method for antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida spp.and Cryptococcus neoformans,although further adjusting of AmB MICs range to a lower level in this method is being expected.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?