Comparative Study on the Energy Performance of Two Different Absorption-Compression Refrigeration Cycles Driven by Low-Grade Heat
Yingjie Xu,Ning Jiang,Qin Wang,Guangming Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.05.169
IF: 6.4
2016-01-01
Applied Thermal Engineering
Abstract:In this paper, performances of an absorption-compression refrigeration cycle with an evaporator condenser (EC) and a novel absorption-compression cycle with an evaporator-subcooler (ES) are carefully compared and analyzed, which both have energy-saving potential. The comparison is based on three energy performance parameters-the COP of compression subsystem, low-grade heat transforming ratio, and global COP taking into account power cycle efficiency. Comparative investigation is carried out over evaporating temperature (T-e) ranging from -20 to 10 degrees C, generating temperature (T-g) ranging from 90 to 1.20 degrees C, and condensing temperature (T-c) ranging from 35 to 45 degrees C. Based on the analysis of COP of compression subsystem, EC should be adopted when low-grade heat is free and absorption system cost is low. According to the analysis of low-grade heat transforming ratio, ES is recommended when low-grade heat cost much. Based on the analysis of global COP, EC saves more energy at low T-e and high T-g, where the global COP of EC is 7.6% and 14.6% higher than that of ES, respectively. However, ES has a good performance at high T-e and low T-g, where the global COP of EC is 18.6% and 8.8% higher, respectively. The better cycle is recommended for different working conditions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.