Abstract:<span>Background: The optimal surgical approach for four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes and complications between the anterior and posterior approaches for four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy.Methods: A total of 19 patients underwent anterior decompression and fusion and 25 patients underwent posterior laminoplasty and instrumentation in this study. Perioperative information, intraoperative blood loss, clinical and radiological outcomes, and complications were recorded. Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, 36-item short form survey (SF-36) score and cervical alignment were assessed.Results: There were no significant differences in JOA scores between the anterior and posterior group preoperatively (11.6 ± 1.6 vs. 12.1 ± 1.5), immediately postoperatively (14.4 ± 1.1 vs. 13.8 ± 1.3), or at the last follow-up (14.6 ± 1.0 vs. 14.2 ± 1.1) (P > 0.05). The JOA scores significantly improved immediately postoperatively and at the last follow-up in both groups compared with their preoperative values. The recovery rate was significantly higher in the anterior group both immediately postoperatively and at the last follow-up. The SF-36 score was significantly higher in the anterior group at the last follow-up compared with the preoperative value (69.4 vs. 61.7). Imaging revealed that there was no significant difference in the Cobb angle at C2–C7 between the two groups preoperatively (−2.0° ± 7.3° vs. −1.4° ± 7.5°). The Cobb angle significantly improved immediately postoperatively (12.3° ± 4.2° vs. 9.2° ± 3.6°) and at the last follow-up (12.4° ± 3.5° vs. 9.0° ± 2.6°) in both groups compared with their preoperative values (P = 0.00). Three patients had temporary dysphagia in the anterior group and four patients had persistent axial symptoms in the posterior group.Conclusions: Both the anterior and posterior approaches were effective in treating four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy in terms of neurological clinical outcomes and radiological features. However, the JOA score recovery rate and SF-36 score in the anterior group were significantly higher. Persistent axial pain could be a major concern when undertaking the posterior approach.</span>

Prognosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated with two decompression approaches

Treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy with laminoplasty based on individual accurate transverse diameter of the spinal canal

[Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy by Decompression of Spinal Canal and Internal Fixation with the Combination of Anterior and Posterior Approaches].

Anterior Discectomies Combined with Corpectomies in Multilevel Cervical Spondylosis Myelopathy

Anterior cervical decompression with fusion for treating multilevel cervical myelopathy

Clinical Efficacy of Decompression Operation through the Anterior and Posterior Approaches in the Treatment of Severe Cervical Spondylosis Myelopathy

Analysis of the Long-Term Outcome of Anterior Approach Surgery on Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Therapeutic Value of Posterior Approach Surgical Treatment for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Treatemnt of the Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy by Anterior Route Cervical Decompression and Bone-Graft Fusion with Plate Internal Fixation

Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Through Ⅰ -Stage Anterior-Posterior Approach

Anterior and posterior approaches decompression in one stage operation for treatment of pinching cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Anterior Cervical Decompression versus Segmental Fusion and Posterior Expansive Canal Plasty in the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

The Analysis of Effect and Complication of the Stenosis of Cervical Spinal Canal Treated with Decompression Through Dorsal Laminectomy

Elaborative decompression under microscope through anterior cervical approach for treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy

[Case-Control Study of Anterior Cervical Decompression Plus Sublevel Fusion and Posterior Cervical Laminodiastv for the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy].

Comparison of the anterior and posterior approach in treating four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Comparison between anterior and posterior decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: subjective evaluation and cost analysis

Choice of Surgical Approaches in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy with Stenosis of Cervical Spinal Canal

The Surgical Approaches of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy and the Predictive Factors for the Surgical Outcomes

Treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy through anterior decompression and internal fixation

[Anterior Decompression for the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Associated with Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament].