The evaluation and analysis to the problems of reoperation in cervical spondylotic myelopathy with spinal stenosis

藏磊,刘忠军,党耕町,刘晓光
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2006.05.005
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the causes of reoperation,surgical patterns,and correlated problems in treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with spinal stenosis.Method:40 cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with spinal stenosis who underwent decompression but with poor outcomes,or recurrence,had revision through secondary posterior decompression of several segments(5 or more) during the period of July 2002 to December 2003.According to surgical patterns and presentation in image examination,the causes of reoperation were analyzed,with assessment of outcome.Result:The main causes of reoperation in patients who underwent anterior decompression were:(1)When long segment or multiple segment cervical spinal stenosis,certain segments with severe compression were chosen,decompressed and fused through anterior approach(15 cases);(2)After anterior decompression and fusion of several segments(3 or more),adjacent segment degeneration continued,new spinal cord compression and instability appeared(9 cases);(3) With OPLL,certain cervical segments decompressed and fused by the anterior approach,but pathological changes advanced,developing spinal cord compression with aggravation(8 cases).The main causes of reoperation in posterior decompression were:(1)Insufficient decompression segments(5 cases,including 1 case decompressed by anterior and posterior approach);(2)Insufficient decompression range(3 cases).At follow-up,1.3~2.7y (mean 2.1y),spinal cord function of all patients improved,and the mean JOA recovery rate was 51.3%.Conclusion:The main cause of reoperation in patients of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with spinal stenosis lies in existing spinal stenosis.Secondary posterior decompression at several segments(5 or more) radically removes the stenosis,which can relieve spinal cord compression at anterior and posterior side of spinal cord,and lead to satisfied outcome.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?