Choice of Surgical Approaches in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy with Stenosis of Cervical Spinal Canal

ZANG Lei,LIU Zhong-jun,DANG Geng-ting,LIU Xiao-guang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-8478.2006.09.003

2006-01-01

Abstract:[Objective]To discuss the strategy of surgery and the choice of surgical approaches for cervical spondylotic myelopathy with stenosis of cervical spinal canal in order to offer helpful experience to the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.[Method]The cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with stenosis of cervical spinal canal which had poor outcome,or recurred decompressed by anterior approach during the period of Jul.2002 to Dec.2003 were collected,and after analyzing,another decompression by posterior approach were performed and the short-term follow-up were undergone;meanwhile,the patients in the similar condition but by posterior approach only during the period of Apr.1985 to May.1992 were drawn randomly,and the long-term follow-up were carried out,and the results were compared.[Result]The recovery rate of the spinal cord function in the patients who were decompressed by anterior approach was only 11.7%,but the posterior one was 70.3%,and the recovery rate of the former patients decompressed again by posterior approach improved to 52.8%.[Conclusion]The main cause of poor outcome,or recurrence decompressed by anterior approach lies in the stenotic factors of spinal canal still existing,and good outcome can still be obtained in a certain extent when another surgical decompressions by posterior approach were performed.However,the patients decompressed by posterior approach initially have achieved a much better outcome in the long-term followed-up.All these indicate that the decompression by posterior approach can enlarge the cervical spinal canal efficiently in one-stage,and improve the curative effect for surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy indeed.