Abstract:In the theory of four—element crime constitution,there is no room for the objective punishment condition.But the objective punishable condition already exists in the criminal legislation of our country now.How to understand and apply these provisions is an issue that cannot be avoided in theory. The general view in the foreign countries is that the objective punishable conditions do not require the actor's cognition and foresight.However,regarding the objective punishable condition in general is suspected of oversimplifying the problem.According to substantial connection between some certain condition and illegality,the objective punishable condition can be divided into the internal and external condition two types,if we insist on the hierarchical constituents of crime theory .The most worthy of discussing is the internal objective punishable condition.It is in the "extended line" of behavior which increases the risk of infringing the interest in law when intervening factors appear.Although it is different from typical illegal element,it can produce illegal effect. Actor just needs to know the possibility of internal objective punishment condition.To the contrary, external objective punishment condition belongs to the category of criminal punishment,has no effect on the illegality and responsibility,and does not require the cognition and foresight of actors. The research of internal objective punishment condition is of great significance to understand and apply some provisions in our criminal legislation.There is necessity for the internal objective punishment condition to exist in the present stage.To put it further,recognizing this concept is in consideration of the doctrines of legally prescribed punishment for special crime and legal interest protection.If we recognize this concept,there is no need to advocate the concept of "objective surpassing elements".The problems regarded under the name of objective surpassing elements can be analyzed according to the approach of internal objective punishment conditions.

On Limitations and Perfection of the Control Punishment from Perspective of the Criminal Policy of temper Justice with Mercy

Judicial Application of Restrictive Commutation of Death Penalty with Suspension: Comment on No. 12 Guiding Case of the Supreme People's Court

From Special Mitigation to Unconstitutional Censorship: Taking Xu Ting Case as an Example

Some Issues on the "Objective Punishment Condition"

Legal Liability of Violation of Obligation on Administrative Law: Between Administrative Punishment and Penalty——Analysis on Article 7 (2) of Administrative Punishment Law

Execution of Freedom Penalty under the Guide of Tempering Criminal Policy with Mercy

The Perfection of Non-penalty Rectification System about Minor Crime in our Country

The International Criminal Juridical Practice and the Relevant Chinese Policy

Internal Objective Punishment Condition

On concept of educational punishment

On the Sentencing Discretion of Punishment Aimed at Prevention

Protection and Punishment: Choice of Criminal Policies Against Juvenile Crimes

The Criminal Policy under the Circumstance of the Contemporary Rule of Law

Judicial Review of the Balance Between Crime and Punishment

On Criminal Penalty Restriction in Internet Public Opinion Supervising

The Change of Criminal Policies and the Penalty Categories Reform

Consequence and Discretionary Action of Sentencing ——the Prohibition of Consequential Responsibility, Double Evaluation and Indirect Punishment

Criminal Compromise:A New Penalty Reform Notion

On Discretionary Mechanism of Penalty for Minor Offenders

Interpretation of the Application of Criminal Law from the Perspective of a Legally Prescribed Punishment for a Specified Crime

A Criminal Policy Analysis on Criminal Norms