Abstract:Developing students' critical thinking skills in writing is essential in different educational contexts. However, the analysis of the argument structure in non-English-major undergraduate students' writing remains largely unexplored. This study aimed to analyze the structure of argumentative English papers written by Chinese university students, based on the adapted Toulmin model of argument structure constituting six elements (claim, data, counterargument claim, counterargument data, rebuttal claim, and rebuttal data). The participants in this study were a class of 47 sophomores enrolled in the course "Modern Education Technology" at Zhejiang University, China. They were required to identify the components of the argument structure in a pre-assigned short text with two opposing views, and to write an argumentative essay. Content analysis was used to assess the students' CT and argument structures. In both tasks, the results found that the majority of the students could identify author's claim with at least a piece of data. They also stated their own claims and provided at least one piece of data to back these up. However, a majority failed to identify the author's counter argument and even though many stated the counter argument claims in their essays, most were unjustified. The majority did not state a conclusion in both tasks. This study may be beneficial in understanding non-English major-undergraduate students' critical thinking skills in English writing and the results suggest that L2 essay writing instructors should use active and explicit methods such as computer-assisted argument mapping tools like RationaleTM to help learners master the argument structure. Some pedagogic guidelines are listed for the implementation of the RationaleTM software in the L2 classroom.

Influence of Discourse Structure of English Argumentation on Chinese Learners' Use of Subjunctive Markers

Analyzing Critical Thinking Elements in the Argument Structure of Non-English-Major Chinese Undergraduate Students' Writing

The Interpretation of Disjunction in the Scope of Dou in Child Mandarin.

The Effects of Discourse Markers on Listening Comprehension

A corpus-based analysis on the acquisition of pragmatic markers by Chinese learners of English

Obstacles for Chinese EFL Learners to Master English Subjunctive Mood

Chinese learners’ use of concessive connectors in English argumentative writing

References and Conjunctions As Cohesive Devices in Chinese Undergraduate EFL Students’ Argumentative Essays

The Use of English Personal Pronouns in Chinese EFL Learners' Argumentative Writing

Interactions in EFL argumentative writing: effects of topic, L1 background, and L2 proficiency on interactional metadiscourse

A Corpus-Based Study between L1 and L2 English Academic Experts: Linking-Adverbial Usage in Linguistics Research Articles

Discourse Markers as the Classificatory Factors of Speech Acts.

The Influence of Chinese Rhetorical Patterns on EFL Writing: Learner Attitudes Towards This Influence

Comparative Study on Hedges in Chinese and American Courtroom Discourse

Lesser relevance markers in Chinese academic spoken English corpus: a cross-disciplinary study on pragmatic features

ON Some Disputed Issues about the English Subjunctive Mood

Chinese as a Foreign Language ( CFL ) Learners ’ Representation of Voice in Argumentative Writing

Metadiscourse: Variation across communicative contexts

The Analysis of Argument-Counterargument Structure in Chinese EFL Learners’ Argumentative Writing

An Empirical Study of Devices for Lexical Cohesion in Chinese EFL Learners′ Written Discourse

Investigating the oral proficiency of English learners in China: A comparative study of the use of pragmatic markers