Valid Reasoning in Ancient China from the Perspective of Modern Logic

杨武金
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-3202.2011.03.006
2011-01-01
Abstract:Ancient Chinese logic concerns reasoning and argumentation. The main aim of argumentation is to reveal the reasons for true statements. The relation between the reasons and the statement to be explained is how the truth of the the statement "necessarily comes about"given the reasons. The Mohists advanced four kinds of reasoning pattern: "illustrating (pi,辟)", "parallelizing (mou, 侔)", "adducing (yuan, 援)" and "inferring (tui, 推)". "Inferring"can also be divided into two kinds of "stopping (zhi, 止)", that is to say, inductive and deductive "stopping" inferences. In addition, the Mohists proposed a standard called "xiao (效)" for determining whether or not reasoning is valid.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?