Prioritizing the perceived equity of the residents to construct an equitable health care system: evidence from a national cross-sectional study in China
Hui Lv,Jianqin Gu,Xiangdong Yuan,Yudong Miao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-5026-9
2020-03-04
Abstract:Background: Building an equitable health care system involves both the promotion of social justice in health and people's subjective perception of the promotion. This study aimed to analyze the overall status and associated factors of the perceived equity of the Chinese health care system, and then to offer policy recommendations for health care reform. Methods: Information on the perceived equity score (scale 0 to 10) of 10,243 valid cases in total were derived from the data set of Chinese Social Survey 2015. Univariate analysis methods were applied to present respondents' overall perceived equity of the Chinese health care system. Multivariate linear regression method was used to explore the associated factors of the perceived equity and examine their independent effect. Results: The respondents gave positive but relatively low marks (6.7 ± 2.6, 95% CI: = 6.64~6.74) of the equity of the Chinese health care system. Younger respondents reported a higher score of perceived equity than their elder counterparts (β = - 0.132, 95% CI: - 0.203~ - 0.062, P < 0.001). Respondents with lower education level were significantly more likely to consider the Chinese health care system equitable (β = - 0.104, 95% CI: - 0.153~ - 0.056, P < 0.001). Respondents satisfied with the Social Health Insurance reimbursement ratio tended to score the system higher in the survey (β = 0.044, 95% CI: 0.024~0.063, P < 0.001). Respondents residing in eastern China and rural areas were significantly more likely to consider the Chinese health care system equitable (β = - 0.268, 95% CI: - 0.338~ - 0.199, P < 0.001). Meanwhile, rural respondents reported higher scores of the perceived equity than urban respondents did (β = 0.348, 95% CI: 0.237~0.458, P < 0.001). Respondents from regions with adequate GPs scored the system higher in this survey (β = 0.087, 95% CI: 0.008~0.165, P < 0.001). The present study found no influence of gender, economic status, Social Health Insurance coverage, or satisfaction with the latest treatment on perceived equity. Conclusions: Eliminating the sense of inequity among a range of populations should be prioritized in health care reform. A national-level investigation system to rate residents' perceived equity was necessary for global health care reform.