Asserting Law and Justice in Despair:Derrida's View on the Deconstruction of Law
Chen Xiaoming
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.2008.01.009
2008-01-01
Abstract:Later in his life,Derrida showed an increasing tendency toward more pragmatic fields such as politics,law,ethics and theology.His few lectures/works on law have laid a solid theoretical foundation for post-modern study of law,especially his Force de loi,Le Fondement mystique de l'autorit(The Force of Law:The Mythical Foundation of Authority),which covers a wide range of topics in law,justice,violence,authority and the mythical nature of authority,and has played a decisive role in the study of law,politics and literature.Derrida uses his theory of deconstruction to expose the complex ties between these sectors.He looks into the relations between law and language,and between justice and violence,laying bare the paradoxical relation between law and justice.He believes that law can be deconstructed,but justice cannot.Exactly because justice can't be deconstructed,it is possible to employ deconstruction in studying justice.Justice,indeed,is not meant to be reached,but without such an unreachable ideal,we would have nothing to expect.Despite the widespread misinterpretation of his deconstruction,Derrida advocates an elevation of responsibility through deconstruction.In the post-modern era,deconstruction makes thinking possible where there is a dead end,and thus makes it possible to construct new ideas.