Abstract:In the 20 th century when civilization and history were precarious, the discontinuity between people and history arrived at an extreme where history became the alienating force against people. Hence how to bridge the chasm between people and history has been one of the cardinal issues pondered by the Neo-Marxism theoreticians in Eastern Europe.From their perspective, both the objective historiography and the abstract speculative philosophy of history dissociate the responsibility of people from history and further to deny the history and the historic nature of people, by which they claim to ethicize history, in other words, to unify people and history through the moral responsibilities of individuals. On one hand, they seek for possible conditions for the ethicization of history from modern occasional situations and deep inside human nature. On the other hand, they introduce responsibility into history in an all-round way from the aspects of existence and history through ontological rendering of individual responsibility with a view to returning history to people themselves. It is hard to gauge that the attempts of ethicizing history by the Neo-Marxism in Eastern Europe is a complete success, but the humanitarianism demonstrated by the attempts is ever more valuable.

Back to Hegel:The Inner Logic of Post-Marxism

Dialectics: Hegel, Marx and Post-Metaphysics

The Attempts for the Ethicization of History by Neo-Marxism in Eastern Europe

Slavoj Zizek in Post-Marxism

In What Sense Is Hegel's Dialectics the Ideological Source of the Transformation of Marxist Philosophy?

Hegel's Logic and Marx's Concept of Capital

Back to Hegel——Thoughts on the Publication of "tanslations of Foreign Studies of Marxology"

Althusser's View on Marx' and Hegel's Dialectics

How to Understand Marx's "Sublating" of Hegel's Dialectic——On Althusser's Fundamental Transforming Theory

Double Connotations of Marx's Negating the Structure of Hegel's Dialectics:Commentary of Althusser's Break Theory of the History of Marx's Philosophy

Radical Democracy,Antagonism and Hegemony--A Critical Interpretation of Laclau and Murfee's post-Marxist political programs

Two Starting-points of the Research of Dialectics

Dialectics of Liberation and Post-Marxist Surplus-investment:On Ernesto Laclau's Critique on Slavoj Zizek

From Interpretation of the World to the Change of the World——Reinterpretation of Marx's Reversal of Hegelian Dialectics

Surpassing and Criticizing Kant's Philosophy by Hegel——Analysis from the Perspective of Marx's Philosophy

Marx and Engels' Critique of Young Hegelianism and Its Significance

A 'Dialectical' Interpretation Mode of Ideological Theory:a comparison among Adorno's,Horheimer's and Marx's theories

The Objectivity of Thought——Comment on the Rational Core of Hegelian Dialectic

The relationship between philosophy of Marx and philosophy of Hegel

Dialectics and the Fate of Contemporary Philosophy--A Comment on T.Adorno's Reinterpretation of Dialectics

Form the Abstract Human Being to the Real Human Being--the Critique and Transcendence by Marx to Traditional Dialectics