Comparative Study Between Transumbilical Single Port Laparoscopic and Conventional Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy or Ureterolithotomy

Haifeng HAO,Changyi QUAN,Gang LI,Zijing LUO,Zhihu LIU,Simeng WEN,Yuanjie NIU

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-1420.2011.09.003

2011-01-01

Journal of Clinical Urology

Abstract:Objective:To discuss the safety,feasibility and advantages of transumbilical single port laparoscopic pyelolithotomy or ureterolithotomy.Methods:The clinical documents of the patients who had been admitted into our hospital and undergone transumbilical single port laparoscopic(group A,n=12) and conventional laparoscopic pyelolithotomy or ureterolithotomy(group B,n = 16) in the period of January 2010 to December 2010 were reviewed. Their operation time,blood loss,hospital stay after operation,the recovery time of bowel function after operation,drainage time,cosmetic result,complications rate and the total cost were contrasted.Results:All operations were successful no post-operative complications occurred in both groups,as to blood loss,group A and B had no significant difference(P>0.05).As to post-operative hospital stay and the total hosp ital cost,group A was much superior to group B(P< 0.05).However,as to the recovery time of bowel function after surgery,group B was superior to group A(P<0.05).Conclusions transumbilical single port laparoscopic pyelolithotomy or ureterolithotomy is a safe and feasible operation.It has the advantages of mini invasion,rapid recovery,short hospitalization and less total hospital cost than conventional laparoscopic pyelolithotomy or ureterolithotomy.It will demonstrate the superiority and become one of the promising surgery methods.