Impact of six different irrigations on ultra-structure of post space

LIU Chang,LIU Hong,YANG Chunying
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-3733.2010.05.22
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the smear layer elimination capability effectiveness of six surface treatments after post space preparation.Methods:Thirty pulpless single-rooted teeth were divided into six groups on the basis of the irrigation regimen after post after post space preparation.(i)saline irrigation(control);(ii)irrigation with 3% hydrogen peroxide followed by 5.25%sodium hypochlorite(NaOCl);(iii)irrigation with 2% chlorhexidine solution followed by 5.25% sodium hypochlorite(NaOCl);(iv)irrigation with 3% hydrogen peroxide followed by 17% EDTA solution.(v)irrigation with 2% chlorhexidine solution followed by 17%EDTA solution;(vi)irrigation with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite(NaOCl)followed by 17%EDTA solution.All the groups were irrigated by 10 ml saline.After irrigation,roots were separated into 3 thirds and each third was observed by field emission scanning electron microscopy(FE-SEM)at a 2 000× magnification.The effectiveness was evaluated by Berg classification.Results:There was a large number of typical smear layer on post space in Group 1(control).Group 2 and Group 3 didn't got rid of the smear layer effectively.Part of the smear layer was eliminated in Group 4.Group 5 and Group 6 did not eliminate the smear effectively.Group 6 seemed to be the most effective in eliminating the smear from canal walls.Conclusion:Irrigation with 2%chlorhexidine solution followed by 17%EDTA solution and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite(NaOCl)followed by 17% EDTA solution can eliminate the smear effectively.Irrigation effect is different on different root levels.The cervical level is more effective than the apical level.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?