Abstract:Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of two different concentrations of chitosan irrigation with two rotary systems (Revo-S and One Shape) on smear layer removal during root canal treatment using scanning electron microscope. Materials and methods Forty freshly extracted human premolar with single canal and nearly straight roots were collected. Teeth were decoronated to obtain a standardized root length of nearly 15 ± 1 mm. Samples were randomly divided into four main groups ( n = 10) according to rotary preparation system and final chitosan irrigation concentration used. Group I: Revo-S rotary system and 5 ml of 0.2% chitosan solution for 3 min as final irrigation. Group II: One Shape single file and 5 ml of 0.2% chitosan solution for 3 min as final irrigation. Group III: Revo-S rotary system and 5 ml of 0.37% chitosan solution for 3 min as final irrigation. Group IV: One Shape single file and 5 ml 0.37% of chitosan solution for 3 min as final irrigation. During preparation and after change of each succeeding file, root canal irrigated with freshly prepared 5 ml of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite solution. Then, rinsed with 5 ml of distilled water. Finally, root canals were irrigated with final chitosan irrigation concentration as mentioned in groups. Samples were split longitudinally and examined by scanning electron microscope analysis. Root canal cleanliness was qualitatively assessed at the coronal, middle, and apical regions of root halves. Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare between final irrigation solutions at each section and Mann–Whitney U test was used for pair-wise comparisons between groups whenever indicated. The significance level was set at P value less than or equal to 0.05. Results It showed that there were no statistical significant differences between groups for smear layer covering the dentinal surfaces. When comparing different root levels, there were no statistical significant differences between coronal versus middle levels but between coronal versus apical and middle versus apical statistical significant differences were found. Conclusions Smear layer can be removed effectively in all tested groups from coronal and middle levels compared to apical level. Using multiple file system (Revo-S files) is better than single file system (One Shape file) in removal of the smear layer of root canal. Increasing the concentration of chitosan to 0.37% promoted removal of the smear layer better than 0.2% of chitosan.

Effect Of Different Irrigation On Smear Layer Removal After Post Space Preparation

Does Endodontic Post Space Irrigation Affect Smear Layer Removal and Bonding Effectiveness?

Impact of six different irrigations on ultra-structure of post space

The effect of final irrigation with different solutions on smear layer removal and dentin erosion: A scanning electron microscope study

Effects of irrigation activation techniques on root canal walls after post-space preparation: A scanning electron microscopy study

Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal in Apical Third Using Four Different Irrigants With Ultrasonic Agitation: An In Vitro Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Analysis

Effectiveness of different irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal : an in vitro study

Efficacy of Different Root Canal Irrigating Solutions in Removing Smear Layer: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study

Bonding Quality of Etch-and-Rinse Adhesives in Root Canals Upon Different Pretreatments.

Comparative Evaluation of Different Methods of Activation of Chelating Solution for Smear Layer Removal in the Apical Portion of the Root Canal Using a Scanning Electron Microscopy: An In Vitro Study

Unveiling SmearOFF Efficacy in Smear Layer Removal through Ultrasonic Activation Examined by Scanning Electron Microscopy

[Comparison of the Effects of 5 Irragant Combinations on Cleaning of Anterior Straight Root Canal Walls].

Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of smear layer removal using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, etidronic acid, and chitosan nanoparticle solution as root canal irrigants

Effects of different irrigation protocols on dentin surfaces as revealed through quantitative 3D surface texture analysis

Evaluation of 17% EDTA and 10% citric acid in smear layer removal and tubular dentin sealer penetration

[In Vitro Evaluation of the Effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher File on Smear Layer Removal after Root Canal Instrumentation].

Effect of Post-Space Treatment on Retention of Fiber Posts in Different Root Regions Using Two Self-Etching Systems.

Smear layer removal comparing conventional irrigation, passive ultrasonic irrigation, EndoActivator System, and a new sonic device (Perfect Clean System) by scanning electron microscopy: An ex vivo study

Effect of two different concentrations of chitosan irrigation on smear layer removal during root canal treatment

Effect of MTAD as an irrigating agent on the removal of smear layer and apical closure after root canal filling

Effect of sodium hypochlorite and ethylenediaminotetraacetic acid activated by laser and ultrasonic energy on surface morphology and chemical composition of intracanal dentin