Abstract:Background Access cavity preparation is a crucial step in nonsurgical root canal treatment. Recent advancements in access cavity designs focus on preserving maximum tooth structure while ensuring sufficient access to canal orifices for effective cleaning and shaping, resulting in minimally invasive procedures. However, there is limited information on the impact of three-dimensional (3D)-guided access cavity preparation in molars. A literature review found no prior studies comparing the effects of various access cavity preparation techniques on apical transportation, untouched surfaces, and debris formation within the canal. Objective The objective of this study is to compare and evaluate the effects of three different access cavity techniques on apical transportation, untouched surfaces, and debris formation within the root canal. Material and methods Thirty extracted permanent mandibular first molars were selected and randomly assigned to three groups for this study: Group I received 3D-printed static guided cavity preparation, Group II underwent conservative access cavity preparation, and Group III was subjected to traditional access cavity (TAC) preparation. The mesial canals in all samples were cleaned and shaped using TruNatomy files. Preoperative and postoperative micro-CT imaging was performed on each sample to assess the effects of the different access cavity preparation techniques on apical transportation, untouched surfaces, and debris formation within the root canal. Results The study found that Group I, which used 3D-printed static guided cavity preparation, exhibited significantly less apical transportation compared to Groups II and III, with mean differences of -0.1677 and -0.2079, respectively. Debris accumulation was similar across all groups, with mean values of 0.928 ± 0.824 for Group I, 0.751 ± 0.495 for Group II, and 0.938 ± 0.681 for Group III, indicating no significant impact of cavity preparation type on debris levels. For untouched canal surfaces, Group III (TAC preparation) had the fewest untouched surfaces, with mean differences of 3.0380 and 3.9020 compared to Groups II and I, respectively. Conclusions While TAC preparation reduces substantial tooth structure, it shows higher instrumentation efficacy and better cleaning of the root canal system. However, in complex cases where tooth structure preservation is crucial, guided access cavity preparation provides an effective balance between structural conservation and adequate canal access. This approach offers a tailored solution, optimizing treatment outcomes based on the specific clinical scenario.

Cerebrospinal nematodiasis in a goat herd.

9q33.3q34.11 microdeletion: new contiguous gene syndrome encompassing STXBP1, LMX1B and ENG genes assessed using reverse phenotyping

Impact of New Vaccine Introduction on Developing Country Immunization Programs and Health Systems

Efficacy of Different Root Canal Irrigating Solutions in Removing Smear Layer: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study

In Vitro Efficacy of Apical Negative Pressure Irrigation in Primary Teeth: A Smear Layer Analysis

Comparative Evaluation of Different Methods of Activation of Chelating Solution for Smear Layer Removal in the Apical Portion of the Root Canal Using a Scanning Electron Microscopy: An In Vitro Study

Evaluation of the Smear Layer Removal Ability of Various Rotary Files with/without Chemical Agents on Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Study

Use of lactoferrin in the newborn: where do we stand?

Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of smear layer removal using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, etidronic acid, and chitosan nanoparticle solution as root canal irrigants

Comparative evaluation of apical debris extrusion during root canal preparation using three different rotary file systems

Smear layer removal efficacy of different irrigation techniques in conservatively instrumented root canals

The Effectiveness of Different Irrigation Techniques on Debris and Smear Layer Removal in Primary Mandibular Second Molars: An In Vitro Study

Bias Reduction of Long Memory Parameter Estimators via the Pre-filtered Sieve Bootstrap

Comparative Evaluation of Three Access Cavity Preparation Techniques on Root Canal Instrumentation Using Micro-CT: An In Vitro Study

More results on computation of topological indices of certain networks

Evaluation of four final irrigation protocols for cleaning root canal walls

Parameters affecting harmonic propagation and distortion levels in nonlinear distribution systems

Effect Of Different Irrigation On Smear Layer Removal After Post Space Preparation

Role of Sympathetic Efferent Nerves in Blood Pressure Regulation and in Hypertension

Comparative Evaluation of Debris Expulsion Beyond Apex During Re-root Canal Treatment by Utilizing Two Re-treatment Rotary Files and Two Reciprocating Files: An In-Vitro Study

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF APICAL EXTRUSION OF DEBRIS AND SHAPING ABILITY IN CURVED ROOT CANALS USING FOUR DIFFERENT NITI INSTRUMENTS