Quantitative investigation in the influence of oxalic impurities on photoluminescence properties of porous AAOs
Yuyan Han,Liang Cao,Faqiang Xu,Tiexin Chen,Zhiyuan Zheng,Kun Qian,Weixin Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.06.008
IF: 4.778
2011-01-01
Materials Chemistry and Physics
Abstract:Anodic alumina oxides (AAOs) prepared in oxalic acid (H 2 C 2 O 4 ) solution at a constant voltage of 40 V were investigated by the techniques of temperature programmed desorption combined mass spectrograph (TPD-MS), thermo gravimetric analysis (TGA), differential thermal analysis (DTA) and photoluminescence (PL). The results indicate that the desorption of H 2 O, CO and CO 2 and the decomposition of H 2 C 2 O 4 which led to the weight loss of AAOs samples occurred below 400 °C, while the water desorption was the main reason for weight loss. In the temperature range of 400–900 °C, a small quantity of aluminum oxalate (Al 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 ) decomposed and gave birth to CO and CO 2 , during this process CO became the major product. The drastic decompositions of aluminum carbonate (Al 2 (CO 3 ) 3 ) and Al 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 took place near 930 °C, which produced a large amount of CO 2 . The amount of (C 2 O 4 ) 2− embedded in bulk AAOs was calculated versus the total weight of AAOs film, and the PL intensity of AAOs was correlated to the doping of oxalic acid radical. The above results may have great significance in the better application of AAOs as matrix of photonic crystals. Keywords Oxide TGA DTA PL 1 Introduction Since the first conference of nanotechnology which was held in America in 1990, AAOs with ordered hexangular holes array have attracted more and more attentions. Nowadays, AAOs have been widely used in many fields such as photovoltaics [1] , nanocapacitor arrays [2] , humidity sensors [3,4] , organic light emitting diodes [5] , and the fabrications of nanostructures of various materials including metals [6–10] , organic molecule [11] , semiconductors [12,13] , magnetic materials [14,15] , organic–metal complexes [16] and polymers [17,18] . Moreover, the AAOs themselves were excellent photonic crystals [19,20] . For example, an intensive and broad PL emission band appears at about 445 nm for AAOs prepared in H 2 C 2 O 4 solution at 40 V dc and H 2 SO 4 solution at 27 V dc [21] . Furthermore, the PL property of AAO could be modulated by some simple methods. Such as, the control of hole diameter [22] , the variation of excitation wavelength [23] and the change of the annealing temperature ( T a ) [24] . People have noticed the PL properties of AAOs were affected by T a [21,24,25] , and mainly two opinions about the PL mechanism have been proposed. The first one considers that the defect centers related oxygen vacancies (F + ) induce the PL of AAOs [26] , and the PL intensity is influenced by the F + concentration [24,27] ; the second one points out that oxyacid radical intermingled in AAOs during electrochemical anodizing processing and their ramifications give rise to the PL properties [28,29] . Erenow, our previous work has studied the influence of F + concentration on PL properties of oxalic AAOs [24] . During the anodizing process of Al in H 2 C 2 O 4 solution, incorporation of (C 2 O 4 ) 2− in bulk AAOs was inevitable. However the quantity of (C 2 O 4 ) 2− was not monitored real-timely during anodizing and annealing processes. So the possibility that (C 2 O 4 ) 2− induces the PL of AAOs could not be excluded. Until now, the quantitative correlation between the content of oxalic impurities and the PL intensities of AAOs is rarely reported. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the quantity variations of (C 2 O 4 ) 2− impurities with T a changes in order to further clarify the relationship between the PL properties of AAOs and (C 2 O 4 ) 2− impurities. This should be of great significance for the development of applications of AAOs. 2 Experimental 2.1 Preparation of porous AAOs The AAOs were prepared by a two-step anodizing process in H 2 C 2 O 4 solution. The high purity (99.999%) tailored aluminum foils were annealed at 500 °C for 10 h in muffle in air atmosphere, and then were cooled down slowly in order to release the stress generated during machining process of these foils. The cool foils were degreased in acetone and cleaned in 0.1 M NaOH solution at 60 °C, then were electropolished in a mixture of sulfuric (5 vol%), phosphoric (95 vol%) and chromic acids (20 g L −1 ) under 20 V dc . The treated foils were anodized in 2 °C, 0.3 M H 2 C 2 O 4 solutions under 40 V dc for 6 h. Subsequently, the formed alumina was dissolved by a mixture solution of phosphoric (6 wt%) and chromic acid (1.8 wt%) at 60 °C for 12 h. Then, the foils were anodized again for 10 h under the same conditions as the first step. The transparent AAOs were obtained after the remaining aluminum was removed by the mixed solution of HCl + CuCl 2 . After the barrier layer was dissolved by 0.3 M phosphoric acid solution, the AAOs were cleaned in deionized water ultrasonically and blow-dried by high purity nitrogen (N 2 ), in order to remove oxalate and some other impurities resided in nanopores and on surface of AAOs. The AAOs obtained were annealed under different temperature respectively for PL analysis, or ground into little pieces in quartz mortar for TPD-MS and thermal analyses. 2.2 Characterization 20 mg AAO pieces were weighed accurately for TPD analysis. The gas analysis MS (QIC20) made by British Hiden Company was used to examine the products released. High purity argon (99.999%) was used as the carrier gas with flow rate of 20 ml min −1 . Temperature was varied from 29.85 °C to 1000 °C with the temperature programming speed of 10 °C min −1 . The thermal analysis was conducted on Shimadzu TGA-50 H. The weight of sample was ca. 45.071 mg. The temperature varied from 28.6 °C to 1200 °C with the temperature programming speed of 10 °C min −1 and N 2 (99.999%) was used as the carrier gas with the flow rate of 50 ml min −1 . The TGA and DTA results were obtained simultaneously. The AAOs blow-dried by N 2 were annealed in quartz tube furnace in argon (99.999%) atmosphere under different temperatures for 6 h. The PL characterizations of AAOs as-prepared and annealed were conducted on fluorescence spectrophotometer (Hitachi 850) with an excitation of the 348 nm line of a Xe lamp. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 TPD-MS analysis Fig. 1 shows the pressure–temperature ( p – t ) curves of H 2 O, CO and CO 2 during TPD-MS process. The inset gives the fine p – t curves of those three products below 883 °C. As we can see from Fig. 1 , the pressure signal of H 2 O increases immediately when temperature increases and reaches a maximum at 178 °C, then decreases rapidly during the temperature range of 178–345 °C. The water is referred to the physically absorbed and chemisorbed water molecules [24] . The molecules of water absorbed by the surface of AAOs and shallow position of nanoholes desorbed easily. Whereas the molecules absorbed by the deep position of nanoholes desorbed difficultly due to the capillarity (surface tension) etc. In the range of 345–545 °C, the pressure of H 2 O decreases gradually. Although the decomposition of H 2 C 2 O 4 gives birth to H 2 O molecules, the pressure values of both CO and CO 2 are much lower than that of H 2 O below 228 °C. This indicates that the quantity of H 2 O originating from H 2 C 2 O 4 decomposition could be negligible if comparing it with the quantity of H 2 O desorbed below 228 °C. The pressure curves of CO and CO 2 in Fig. 1 shows only trace amount of CO and CO 2 exist in background before 228 °C; then, the pressure signals of CO and CO 2 increase simultaneously and apparently, which indicates the generation of CO and CO 2 . Considering this temperature is not higher enough for Al 2 (CO 3 ) 3 decomposition and the decomposition temperature of H 2 C 2 O 4 is lower than that of Al 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 , CO and CO 2 should originate from H 2 C 2 O 4 decomposition shown as reaction (1) : (1) H 2 C 2 O 4 (s) → CO (g) + CO 2 (g) + H 2 O (g) The fine p – t curves of CO and CO 2 coincide with each other almost during the range of 228–260 °C, this indicates the molar ratio of CO to CO 2 is near 1:1. The result above agrees well with the decomposition principle of H 2 C 2 O 4 (see reaction (1) ). The H 2 O generated was desorbing simultaneously during H 2 C 2 O 4 decomposition process. Considering the hysteretic phenomenon induced by H 2 O absorption and condensation in TPD-MS gas-pipeline, the pressure response time of H 2 O would lag behind that of CO and CO 2 . Consequently, the “apparent temperature” of H 2 O measured by MS will be higher than that of CO and CO 2 , and tailing phenomena appears. According to the previous analyses, the H 2 O examined during 345–545 °C should originate from decomposition of H 2 C 2 O 4 and desorption of H 2 O which condensed in the TPD-MS pipeline before. The pressure of CO 2 increases with the enhancement of temperature and reaches a maximum at 320 °C, then decreases and attains to a minimum at 450 °C; the pressure of CO exceeds that of CO 2 and increases rapidly when temperature is above 260 °C. The results above indicate the quantity of H 2 C 2 O 4 decreases quickly and could be negligible above 450 °C; and the new reaction giving birth to CO has been occurred since 260 °C, which induces the pressure of CO to exceed that of CO 2 and increase rapidly. The most possible reaction is the incomplete decomposition of Al 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 , as is shown by reaction (2) : (2) Al 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 (s) → 3CO (g) + Al 2 (CO 3 ) 3 (s) The pressure of CO increases gradually in the range of 320–881 °C. This is because most of Al 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 was embedded in the crystal lattices of Al 2 O 3 and could not decompose completely. The decomposition velocity of Al 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 is low and increases gradually with the enhancement of temperature. The pressure tendency of CO 2 during 500–883 °C indicates that only a small quantity of Al 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 decomposes completely according to reaction (3) , and the decomposition velocity of Al 2 (CO 3 ) 3 increases gradually either. A large amount of Al 2 (CO 3 ) 3 generated from Al 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 decomposition was accumulated during 320–881 °C. (3) Al 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 (s) → 3CO (g) + 3CO 2 (g) + Al 2 O 3 (s) (4) Al 2 (CO 3 ) 3 (s) → 3CO 2 (g) + 2Al 2 O 3 (s) The pressure signals of CO and CO 2 begin to increase rapidly at 883 °C and the pressure of CO 2 is much higher than that of CO during 883–1000 °C. The results above indicate that not only Al 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 remaining , but also Al 2 (CO 3 ) 3 accumulated decompose completely and drastically (see reactions (3) and (4) ) during this temperature range. The area integral results of the pressure cures of CO and CO 2 show that the total amount of CO 2 is much larger than that of CO, that is a large quantity of Al 2 (CO 3 ) 3 was formed during the anodizing process of aluminum foils. The decomposition velocities of both Al 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 and Al 2 (CO 3 ) 3 reach the maximum at 930 °C. It is noticeable that the reason of the rapid decomposition of Al 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 and Al 2 (CO 3 ) 3 should have a close relationship with the phase transformation of the Al 2 O 3 composing AAOs. The transformation velocity is relatively lower below 883 °C, so the structure change of crystal lattices is undersized. As temperature is increased further, crystal phase transforms drastically so that the collapse of AAO structure occurs [30] , which induces a great deal of oxalate and carbonate to be exposed and decompose quickly. We should notice that the amount of H 2 O examined by MS is tiny and much less than the amount of CO and CO 2 during 883–1000 °C. According to TPD-MS results of it could be concluded that: the pressure of CO is larger than that of CO 2 during 260–883 °C, which indicates that only a little Al 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 decomposes and gives birth to CO 2 as reaction (3) , the most of Al 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 decomposes and generates CO and Al 2 (CO 3 ) 3 as reaction (2) . The velocity of reaction (2) is larger than that of reaction (4) , so that a large amount of Al 2 (CO 3 ) 3 is accumulated before 883 °C. The total quantity of CO 2 is much larger than that of CO, which indicates that there is a plenty of Al 2 (CO 3 ) 3 was formed and embedded in AAOs bulk during the anodizing process. The decomposition velocities of both oxalate and carbonate embedded in AAOs bulk are different apparently pre and post 883 °C under the effect of the structure change of crystal lattices. Fig. 2 shows the mass percentage curves regarding CO, CO 2 , H 2 O and CO + CO 2 during TPD-MS process. As can be seen, the mass percentage of H 2 O is above 0.8 before 200 °C, then decreases rapidly and attains to 0.25 at 330 °C. Which could be explained by the abatement of H 2 O desorption and the enhancement of H 2 C 2 O 4 and Al 2 (CO 3 ) 3 decompositions. The weight percentage of H 2 O decreases from 0.25 at 330 °C to 0.1 at 883 °C gradually, the ratios of CO and CO 2 increase and CO becomes the major product. From the curve intersections, the mass percent of H 2 O equals to that of CO + CO 2 at 262 °C and the mass of CO + CO 2 is about 98% at 930 °C. All the analyses above of TPD-MS process show that: desorbed H 2 O is the main product below 262 °C; CO which originates from decomposition of Al 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 becomes the major product during 262–883 °C; CO 2 which comes from Al 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 and Al 2 (CO 3 ) 3 decompositions becomes the main product during 883–1000 °C. Those results above could be used to explain the TGA process as follows. 3.2 Thermal analysis The processes giving birth to CO, CO 2 and H 2 O, and the proportions of the three products have been learned clearly according to TPD-MS results. In order to further calculate the quantity and the content change of (C 2 O 4 ) 2− , thermal analysis was carried out. Fig. 3 shows the TGA curve of the as-prepared AAOs. Three main weight loss regions could be observed apparently in this figure. The first section is from 28.6 °C to 402.2 °C, weight loss for this section is ca. 0.335 mg that is 0.743% of the total weight. The second section is the range of 402.2–866.7 °C, the weight loss and weight loss ratio are ca. 0.0839 mg and 0.186% respectively. The third process begins from 866.7 °C and ends up with 1022.9 °C, weight loss for this region is ca. 2.699 mg which is 5.988% of the initial weight. Almost no weight loss could be observed during 1022.9–1076.6 °C, which could indicates both Al 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 and Al 2 (CO 3 ) 3 have decomposed wholly. According to TPD-MS results, weight loss in the first section is attributed to the desorption of H 2 O, CO and CO 2 , and the decomposition of H 2 C 2 O 4 ·H 2 O desorption should be the main reason for weight loss. We also noticed that the weight loss process during 28.6–402.2 °C could be divided into 3 parts, see inset in Fig. 3 . They are the ranges of 28.6–106.1 °C, 106.1–233.5 °C, and 233.5–402.2 °C. According to the linear fits of those three parts, we get the slopes of them are −6.9 × 10 −4 , −9.2 × 10 −4 and −10.4 × 10 −4 . Those slopes shown as dotted lines suggest that weight loss rate increase gradually. That is new desorptions or decompositions occur in turn. Depending on TPD-MS results, the weight loss below 106.1 °C is mainly caused by H 2 O desorption; the desorptions of CO and CO 2 absorbed physically is performing during 106.1–233.5 °C, and H 2 C 2 O 4 decomposes in the vicinity of 228 °C (see reaction (1) ); during the range of 233.5–402.2 °C, Al 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 decomposes continuously besides H 2 C 2 O 4 (see reaction (2) ). The weight loss process for the second section is long and slow, which agrees with the result in article [31] . TPD-MS results show this should be caused by the slow decompositions of Al 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 and Al 2 (CO 2 ) 3 , and Al 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 decomposition is the main reaction. Weight loss for the third section is a rapid process, in which 84.7% of the total weight loss occurs. The substances inducing weight loss correspond with the products examined by TPD-MS during 883–1000 °C. It is noticeable that an inflexion is observed at 931.9 °C in the TGA curve, which suggests weight loss is an accelerating process below 931.9 °C. Weight loss rate decreases rapidly above 931.9 °C, which suggests that the majority of Al 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 and Al 2 (CO 3 ) 3 have decomposed already. The decompositions of Al 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 and Al 2 (CO 3 ) 3 finish at 1022.9 °C. Fig. 4 shows the DTA curve of AAOs pieces during the thermal analysis process. From Fig. 4 , the thermal effect becomes distinct at 680 °C and is endothermic mainly during 800–1070 °C, although there are 2 short apparent exothermic processes in the vicinities of 889.4 °C and 1039.2 °C. According to TPD-MS results, the endothermic tendency should be induced by the decompositions of Al 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 and Al 2 (CO 3 ) 3 . The 2 short exothermic processes correspond with the rapid phase transformations of amorphous Al 2 O 3 to γ-Al 2 O 3 and γ-Al 2 O 3 to α-Al 2 O 3 respectively, which agree with the previous report [32] . The DTA curve becomes a straight line above 1070 °C, this indicates that no decomposition is proceeding and γ-Al 2 O 3 phase has converted to the stable phase corundum already. The AAOs as-prepared and annealed below 800 °C are mainly composed of amorphous alumina [24,27,30,32] . Although the AAOs are annealed at 700 °C for 6 h [24] and 750 °C for 4 h [30] , no obvious diffraction peaks appear. The results above indicate that the degree of phase transformation has not carried out enough lest the structure of crystal lattices should collapse. Only impurities located in the shallow position of AAOs bulk could decompose below 883 °C. Elongation of annealing time at low temperature only allows oxalate and carbonate mingled at the shallow position to decompose fully, while the oxalate and carbonate embedded in the deep position could not decompose. So the TGA curve during 402.2–866.7 °C is long and gentle, and weight loss is relatively tiny. Phase transformations of Al 2 O 3 near 889.4 °C and 1039.2 °C perform quickly, which correspond with conversions of amorphous Al 2 O 3 to γ-Al 2 O 3 and γ-Al 2 O 3 to α-Al 2 O 3 respectively. The rapid phase transformation near 889.4 °C has already induced the apparent change of crystal lattices [33] , which induces Al 2 (C 2 O 4 ) 3 and Al 2 (CO 3 ) 3 embedded in the deep position of AAOs bulk to be exposed and decompose drastically. So 84.7% of total weight loss is observed during 886.7–1022.9 °C. 3.3 Relationship of oxalic quantity with PL property According to TPD-MS results, the weight percentages of H 2 O, CO and CO 2 during different temperature ranges were obtained. The quantity and the content variations of (C 2 O 4 ) 2− could be calculated according to the combination of TPD-MS and TGA results. The relationship between oxalic impurities and PL properties of AAOs could be determined either by comparing the variations of oxalate content and PL spectrum. Since the molar ratio of CO to (C 2 O 4 ) 2− is 1:1 (see reactions (1)–(3) ) and the quantity of CO desorbed below 200 °C could be negligible, the quantity of (C 2 O 4 ) 2− doped in AAOs bulk could be calculated. The total weight of CO calculated by TPD-MS and TGA results is ca. 0.5699 mg and 18.28% of total weight loss. The weight of (C 2 O 4 ) 2− impurity mingled in AAOs bulk is 1.7909 mg (see content calculation), and accounts for 3.97% of the weight of AAOs. w 1 = w 0 × m 1 m 0 = 0.5699 mg × 88.02 28.01 = 1.7909 mg where w is the weight, m is the molar mass, 0 is CO, and 1 is (C 2 O 4 ) 2− ). Fig. 5 shows the PL spectra of AAOs as-prepared and annealed at different temperature. From this figure we could learn whether AAOs were annealed or not, an intensive and broad PL band appears at about 445 nm. The intensity of this band increases firstly with T a increase and reaches the maximum at about 500 °C, then decreases drastically with the further increase of T a . The PL intensity of AAO annealed at 700 °C has reduced to the same degree as that of AAO as-prepared. Fig. 6 gives the variations of both (C 2 O 4 ) 2− content and PL intensity of AAOs. As seen from this figure, the (C 2 O 4 ) 2− content reduces gradually below 900 °C. 83.7% of the total quantity of (C 2 O 4 ) 2− mingled in AAOs still remains after the AAOs are annealed at 500 °C. Even the AAOs are annealed at 700 °C, the residual ratio of (C 2 O 4 ) 2− still accounts for 79.6%. The ratio of (C 2 O 4 ) 2− decomposed during 900–1000 °C is 71%. The content change of (C 2 O 4 ) 2− is less evident at 200 °C, while the PL intensity of the AAOs annealed at 200 °C has enhanced obviously already in contrast with that of AAOs as-prepared. During the range of 320–886 °C the residual quantity of (C 2 O 4 ) 2− mingled in AAOs decreases gradually, which is very different from the rapid variation of PL intensity. Those analysis results above suggest that there is no direct relationship between the variation of (C 2 O 4 ) 2− content and the change of PL intensity, that is the doping of (C 2 O 4 ) 2− impurity in AAO bulk is not the direct reason for the PL of AAOs. Our previous work has indicated that the PL and EPR spectra have the similar variety tendencies [24] . For the AAO templates, the oxygen vacancies and F + centers may originate from two aspects. (1) During the heat treatment from room temperature up to 500 °C, the transformation of Al 2 O 3 from amorphous to crystalline states may take place which may induce the formation of oxygen vacancies due to the lattice stress at phase boundaries. (2) The remained aluminum reacts with oxygen in AAO to form new alumina. It is possible that many oxygen vacancies exist in the newly formed alumina, because the oxygen reacting with the remaining aluminum is mainly provided by AAO itself in inert atmosphere [21,27] . In addition, the increase of oxygen vacancies leads F + centers to increase as T a is increased because an F + center is formed by an oxygen vacancy trapping an electron [21] . With further increasing T a above 500 °C, the crystallinity is promoted either, the boundary area between crystalline and amorphous phases will decrease, and the amount of F + may decrease correspondingly. Especially the crystal type has become very uniform when the rapid phase transformation occurs. This lead the amount of the defect centers to decrease quickly, the F + cannot be detected directly by EPR technique. The result above agrees well with article [27] . Fig. 1 clearly shows that large amount of H 2 O molecules is desorbed below 500 °C, which could reduced the fluorescence quenching effect of H 2 O. So the increase of PL intensity below 500 °C is closely related to water desorption besides the enhancement of F + concentration. When T a is above 500 °C, the distinct decrease of PL intensity should closely relate to the reduction of F + concentration, which agrees well with article [21,27] . 4 Conclusions TPD-MS, TGA, DTA and PL techniques were used to examine the AAOs prepared by a two-step anodizing process in 2 °C, 0.3 M oxalic solution at 40 V dc , the decomposition process and content change of (C 2 O 4 ) 2− accompanying temperature increase were clearly determined. When T a is below 500 °C, the desorption of water molecules and the increase of F + concentration induce the enhancement of PL intensity of AAOs together. As T a is above 500 °C, the reduction of F + concentration gives rise to the decrease of PL intensity. By comparing the variety of (C 2 O 4 ) 2− content with the change of PL intensity, the relationship between the doping of (C 2 O 4 ) 2− and the PL of AAOs is further confirmed. That is the doping of (C 2 O 4 ) 2− is not the direct reason for the PL of oxalic AAOs. Those conclusions above should have great significance for the development of applications of AAOs. Acknowledgement This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 10975138 and 10775126 ). References [1] Z. Fan H. Razavi J. Do A. Moriwaki O. Ergen Y. Chueh P.W. Leu1 J.C. Ho T. Takahashi L.A. Reichertz S. Neale K. Yu M. Wu J.W. Ager A. Javey Nat. Mater. 8 2009 648 653 [2] W. Lee H. Han A. Lotnyk M.A. Schubert S. Senz M. Alexe D. Hesse S. Baik U. Gösele Nat. Nanotechnol. 3 2008 402 407 [3] R.K. Nahar V.K. Khanna Sens. Actuators B 46 1998 35 41 [4] G. Sberveglieri R. Murri N. Pinto Sens. Actuators B 23 1995 177 180 [5] A.V. Kukhta G.G. Gorokh E.E. Kolesnik A.I. Mitkovets M.I. Taoubi Y.A. Koshin A.M. Mozalev Surf. Sci. 507–510 2002 593 597 [6] D. Borissov S. Isik-Uppenkamp M. Rohwerder J. Phys. Chem. C 113 2009 3133 3138 [7] L.H. Liu H.T. Li S.H. Fan J.J. Gu Y.P. Li H.Y. Sun J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 321 2009 3511 3514 [8] F.H. Xue G.T. Fei B. Wu P. Cui L.D. Zhang J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 2005 15348 15349 [9] R.L. Zong J. Zhou Q. Li B. Du B. Li M. Fu X.W. Qi L.T. Li J. Phys. Chem. B 108 2004 16713 16716 [10] X.Y. SUN F.Q. XU Z.M. LI W.H. Zhang Mater. Chem. Phys. 90 2005 69 72 [11] H.X. Ji J.S. Hu Q.X. Tang W.P. Hu W.G. Song L.J. Wan Adv. Mater. 18 2006 2753 2757 [12] M. Chang X.L. Cao X.J. Xu L.d. Zhang Phys. Lett. A 372 2008 273 276 [13] C. Wu J.B. Shi C.J. Chen Y.C. Chen Y.T. Lin P.F. Wu S.Y. Wei Mater. Lett. 62 2008 1074 1077 [14] Y. XU J.X. XU L.H. JIANG Chin. J. Inorg. Chem. 25 2009 459 464 [15] S. Shamaila R. Sharif J.Y. Chen H.R. Liu X.F. Han J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 321 2009 3984 3989 [16] H.X. Ji J.S. Hu Y.G. Guo W.G. Song L.J. Wan Adv. Mater. 20 2008 4879 4882 [17] X.L. Liu F.Q. Xu Z.M. Li J.F. Zhu W.H. Zhang Opt. Mater. 30 2008 1861 1866 [18] T. Yanagishita R. Fujimura K. Nishio H. Masuda Langmuir 26 2010 1516 1519 [19] T.E. Nee C.H. Fang Y.R. Chen J.C. Wang P.L. Fan J.A. Jiang Thin Solid Films 518 2009 1439 1442 [20] J. Wang C.W. Wang Y. Li W.M. Liu Thin Solid Films 516 2008 7689 7694 [21] Y. Du W.L. Cai C.M. Mo J. Chen L.D. Zhang X.G. Zhu Appl. Phys. Lett. 74 1999 2951 2953 [22] A. Rauf M. Mehmood M. Ahmed M. Hasan M. Aslam J. Lumin. 130 2010 792 800 [23] Z.J. Li K.L. Huang J. Lumin. 127 2007 435 440 [24] X.Y. Sun F.Q. Xu Z.M. Li W. Zhang J. Lumin. 121 2006 588 594 [25] I. Vrublevsky A. Jagminas S. Hemeltjen W.A. Goedel Appl. Surf. Sci. 254 2008 7326 7330 [26] G.S. Huang X.L. Wu Y.F. Mei X.F. Shao G.G. Siu J. Appl. Phys. 93 2003 582 585 [27] Y. Li G.H. Li G.W. Meng L.D. Zhang F. Phillipp J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 13 2001 2691 2699 [28] Y. Yamamoto N. Baba S. Tajima Nature 289 1981 572 574 [29] T. Gao G.W. Meng L.D. Zhang J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15 2003 2071 2079 [30] L. Fernández-Romero J.M. Montero-Moreno E. Pellicer F. Peiró A. Cornet J.R. Morante M. Sarret C. Müller Mater. Chem. Phys. 111 2008 542 547 [31] J.A. Wang X. Bokhimi A. Morales O. Novaro T. López R. Gómez J. Phys. Chem. B 103 1999 299 303 [32] W.L. Xu M.J. Zheng S. Wu W.Z. Shen Appl. Phys. Lett. 85 2004 4364 4366 [33] X.H. Wang C.Y. Li G. Chen L. He H. Cao Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 98 2009 745 749