Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Bile Duct Stone: ROC Analysis

LIU Fang-li,ZHANG Xiao-ming,XIAO Bo,TANG Wei,ZHAI Shao-hua,Huang Xiao-hua,ZENG Nan-lin,GU Peng,LIU Jian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-5741.2011.05.017
2011-01-01
Abstract:Purpose:To compare the value of magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) and ultrasonography(US) in the diagnosis of bile duct stone(B;;DS).Methods:A total of 136 consecutive patients with suspected B;;DS were recruited from May 2010 to February 2011.They were performed both abdominal MR imaging and US at the same period before surgery.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of MRI and US based on surgery were analyzed.The areas under receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curves were calculated for comparing MRI with US in the diagnosis of B;;DS.Results:Among the 136 patients,82 patients were performed surgery and were confirmed with B;;DS.Of the 82 patients with B;;DS,43 patients had intrahepatic lithiasis(IHL),73 patients(34 patients coexisted with IHL) had extrahepatic lithiasis(EHL).The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of US and MRI in detecting IHL were 79.1%,94.9% and 86.6%,and 93.0%,94.9% and 93.9%,respectively.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of US and MRI in detecting EHL were 65.8%,66.7% and 65.9%,and 93.2%,77.8% and 91.5% respectively.The areas under ROC curves for MRI and US in detecting IHL were 0.971 and 0.964,respectively(P0.05),and in diagnosing EHL were 0.855 and 0.776,respectively(P0.05).Conclusion:MRI and US have a similar value in detecting IHL.However,MRI is superior to US in detecting EHL.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?