Abstract:The relationship between human and nature is a primary problem of Chinese traditional philosophy. The ideology of human?nature integration is an important mentality of Chinese ancient thinkers. Originating from the thought of“divine?human connection”and after a long history of accumulation, it has been internalized in the mind of Chinese people and become a unique thinking mode of Chinese descendants. In methodology, this thinking mode is reflected in the holism in cosmology and values, and in contradiction view of“integration?division?integration”. In epistemology, it is reflected in the unification of subject and object. Therefore, the thinking mode of human?nature integration is of enlightening significance for the reconstruction of modern ecoethics. Firstly, taking human as the starting point and home and nature and nature rules as the prerequisite and principle, it integrates the internal dimensions with external dimensions of human??s activity to overcome the shortcoming of subject?object dichotomy between anthropocentrism and non?anthropocentrism. Secondly, it sublates the division and sharp confliction between anthropocentrism and non?anthropocentrism in purpose and means by claiming that human is means as well as purpose. Thirdly, it advocates giving full play to subjectivity and initiative of human, which transcends the disagreement of anthropocentrism and non?anthropocentrism in the issue of subjectivity. Fourth, it has flexibly dialectical nature in that it may emphasize human??s transformation of nature or human??s reverence toward nature according to human’s practical needs. Finally, different from anthropocentrism deriving from utilitarianism or extreme humanism and non?anthropocentrism deriving from scientism or naturalism, the ideology of human?nature integration is rooted in Chinese traditional ethic culture with high moral value and nature of both humanism and naturalism, and thus it is ultra?utilitarian and transcends the one?sidedness and short?sighted practicability of anthropocentrism and non?anthropocentrism.

What is the Basis of Human Action on Earth——Reconsidering the Hypothesis of Self-interested in Economy

On the Issue of Human Nature and Marx's Concept of Human Nature Liberation

Psychological basis and the problems of the assumption of human nature in modern economics——Comparison of"economic man"hypothesis and the behavior mechanism of "self-interest and altruism"

The Behavior Mechanism of "For Oneself by Benefiting Others" in Reality:Connotation and Its Rationality

An Investigation of Moral Basis of Market Society from the Perspective of Social Morals

A Demarcation's Principle Between Egoism or Altruism About Human Action —An Analysis Based on the Behavior Mechanism of "for Oneself by Benefiting Others"

How to Understand Human's Behavior in Real World——A Differentiation and Analysis Between Act-utilitarianism and Reciprocity

On the Theory About“ the Natural Instincts of People Selfish” and the Reform Direction

The"Objectivity Activity"Logic of Human Essence in the Perspective of Relativism and the World Significance of the"Chinese Road"

Ideology of Human-Nature Integration and Reconstruction of Modern Ecoethics

Altruistic Behavior and Internal Mechanism

How to Define Egoism and Altruism in Human's Action——A Survey on the Popular Demarcation's Criterion

Coming of Ecological Era and the Re-cognition of the Self of Human

Han Feizi on Human Nature

Another Form of Environmental Philosophy: Hnman Ecology (the first half)

Rethinking Erich Fromm's Humanism and His View of Human Nature

Tracing to the Source of the Dimidiate Motive View of Human Behavior——Two Kinds of Connotation Derived from Utilitarianism

A New Study of Humanity

Eco-philosophy Analysis based on Hominine Selfishness---Discussing Ecological Problem

Human Nature(s): Human Nature at the Crossroad of Conflicting Interests

The Ubiquitous Significance for the Behavior Mechanism of "For Oneself by Benefiting Others": Important Inference