Abstract:How can scientific progress be conceived best? Does science mainly undergo revolutionary paradigm shifts? Or is the evolution of science mainly cumulative? Understanding whether science advances through cumulative evolution or through paradigm shifts can influence how we approach scientific research, education and policy. The most influential and cited account of science was put forth in Thomas Kuhn’s seminal book The structure of scientific revolutions . Kuhn argues that science does not advance cumulatively but goes through fundamental paradigm changes in the theories of a scientific field. There is no consensus yet on this core question of the nature and advancement of science that has since been debated across science. Examining over 750 major scientific discoveries (all Nobel Prize and major non-Nobel Prize discoveries), we systematically test this fundamental question about scientific progress here. We find that three key measures of scientific progress—major discoveries, methods and fields—each demonstrate that science evolves cumulatively. First, we show that no major scientific methods or instruments used across fields (such as statistical methods, X-ray methods or chromatography) have been completely abandoned, i.e. subject to paradigm shifts. Second, no major scientific fields (such as biomedicine, chemistry or computer science) have been completely abandoned. Rather, they have all continuously expanded over time, often over centuries, accumulating extensive bodies of knowledge. Third, scientific discoveries including theoretical discoveries are also predominately cumulative, with only 1% of over 750 major discoveries having been abandoned. The continuity of science is most compellingly evidenced by our methods and instruments, which enable the creation of discoveries and fields. We thus offer here a new perspective and answer to this classic question in science and the philosophy and history of science by utilizing methods from statistics and empirical sciences.

Is There Another Kind of Scientific Revolution?——On Peter Galison and His Trading Zone Theory

Development of Science and Technology and the Process of the Liberation of Humankind——New Thoughts Based on Engels' "Dialectics of Nature"

General Variation Theory: A Perspective of Generalized Science

The revolution in physics of the early Nineteenth century revisited in the context of science-and-society interaction

The Experiment in Historical and Philosophical Perspective:A Comparative Research on How Experiments End by Peter Calison and Representing and Intervening by ]an Hacking

How Can We Understand Ancient Societies the in History of Science?——“New History of Science” and “Cross-culture” of G.E.R.Lloyd and Its Revelation

How research programs come apart: the example of supersymmetry and the disunity of physics

Kuhn Revisited

The Scientificity of Marx's Theory: an Interpretation in View of Philosophy of Scientific Practice

Globalization and Glassy Ideality of the Web of Twentieth Century Science

A New Scientific Revolution at the Horizon?

From Constructivism to Generativism:The Historical Transition of Systematic Thought

The Change-Driver Account of Scientific Discovery: Philosophical and Historical Dimensions of the Discovery of the Expanding Universe

Writing at the 50th Anniversary of Publication of Ex Perimental Technolo Gy and M Anagement

Kuhn in Philosophy of Scientific Practices

On Scientific Revolution:Comparison Between the "structural" and the "Dynamic"

The Dissension Between Pickering's Constructivism Account and Scientists' Account——A Debate on the History of HEP

Debunking revolutionary paradigm shifts: evidence of cumulative scientific progress across science

The relativity revolution from the perspective of historical epistemology

Science as exploration in a knowledge landscape: tracing hotspots or seeking opportunity?

The Project of a Philosophy of Scientific Practice Put Forward by Joseph Rouse