On Scientific Revolution:Comparison Between the "structural" and the "Dynamic"

王彦君
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-2692.2009.02.003
2009-01-01
Abstract:Thomas Kun’s structural explanation of scientific revolution has cut off the sustained development of science history, has not been able to explain the progress and development of theory of science very well. But philosophy of science in Russia took scientific revolution as the impetus scientific progress power, and explained the mechanism of the science progressive, thus demonstrates the distinct and the theory superiority of the philosophy of science in Russia.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?