Comparison of Seminested-Pcr and PCR-RFLP for Detection of Penicillin-Resistant Streptococcus Pneumoniae Isolates

DING Jing-jing,ZHANG De-ping,SHAO Hai-feng,SHI Yi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13602/j.cnki.jcls.2011.02.009
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To find out a rapid and reliable method to detect penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae(PRSP) and its drug-resistance,and evaluate the application of seminested-PCR and PCR-RFLP for this assay.Methods One hundred and thirty clinical S.pneumoniae isolates and 50 isolates from healthy carriers were collected in Nanjing between March 2005 and June 2007.The minimum inhibitory concentration(MIC) to penicillin was measured by agar dilution test.The genome of S.pneumoniae was extracted and amplified by seminested-PCR and PCR-RFLP to detect the resistance to penicillin.Results All isolates from healthy carriers were susceptible to penicillin.Among the clinical isolates,the susceptible,intermediate and resistant rates to penicillin were 25.4%,23.1% and 51.5% respectively.When MIC were between 0.25-0.5 μg/ml,the sensitivity,specificity,positive and negative predictive values in seminested-PCR assay were 86.7%,98.6%,86.7% and 98.6% respectively,while they were 96.2%,97.6%,97.4% and 96.4% when MIC were greater than or equal to 1 μg/ml.By PCR-RFLP the sensitivity for intermediate isolates was 34.2% and the positive predictive values was 67.5%,thus only susceptible isolates were detectable.Conclusion For rapid diagnosis of PRSP,seminested-PCR should be better than PCR-RFLP which may be applied in epidemiological analysis for its poor sensitivity.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?