Abstract:We study the fundamental scheduling problem $1\mid r_j\mid\sum w_j U_j$: schedule a set of $n$ jobs with weights, processing times, release dates, and due dates on a single machine, such that each job starts after its release date and we maximize the weighted number of jobs that complete execution before their due date. Problem $1\mid r_j\mid\sum w_j U_j$ generalizes both Knapsack and Partition, and the simplified setting without release dates was studied by Hermelin et al. [Annals of Operations Research, 2021] from a parameterized complexity viewpoint. Our main contribution is a thorough complexity analysis of $1\mid r_j\mid\sum w_j U_j$ in terms of four key problem parameters: the number $p_\#$ of processing times, the number $w_\#$ of weights, the number $d_\#$ of due dates, and the number $r_\#$ of release dates of the jobs. $1\mid r_j\mid\sum w_j U_j$ is known to be weakly para-NP-hard even if $w_\#+d_\#+r_\#$ is constant, and Heeger and Hermelin [ESA, 2024] recently showed (weak) W[1]-hardness parameterized by $p_\#$ or $w_\#$ even if $r_\#$ is constant. Algorithmically, we show that $1\mid r_j\mid\sum w_j U_j$ is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by $p_\#$ combined with any two of the remaining three parameters $w_\#$, $d_\#$, and $r_\#$. We further provide pseudo-polynomial XP-time algorithms for parameter $r_\#$ and $d_\#$. To complement these algorithms, we show that $1\mid r_j\mid\sum w_j U_j$ is (strongly) W[1]-hard when parameterized by $d_\#+r_\#$ even if $w_\#$ is constant. Our results provide a nearly complete picture of the complexity of $1\mid r_j\mid\sum w_j U_j$ for $p_\#$, $w_\#$, $d_\#$, and $r_\#$ as parameters, and extend those of Hermelin et al. [Annals of Operations Research, 2021] for the problem $1\mid\mid\sum w_j U_j$ without release dates.

Single Machine Preemptive Scheduling with Fixed Jobs and Release Dates to Minimize the Total Number of Tardy Jobs

Scheduling to Minimize the Maximum Total Completion Time Per Machine.

Single Machine Batch Scheduling to Minimize the Sum of Total Flow Time and Batch Delivery Cost with an Unavailability Interval

Scheduling with a minimum number of machines

Minimizing Total Completion Time Subject to Job Release Dates and Preemption Penalties

Single Machine Scheduling to Minimize Total Weighted Earliness Subject to Minimal Number of Tardy Jobs

Online Scheduling to Minimize Modified Total Tardiness with an Availability Constraint

Single Machine Scheduling with Common Due Date and Controllable Processing Times

Single-Machine Scheduling to Minimize the Number of Tardy Jobs with Release Dates

Single machine scheduling to minimize maximum earliness/tardiness cost with job rejection

New Solution Approaches to the General Single- Machine Earliness-Tardiness Problem

Single Machine Group Scheduling with Decreasing Time-Dependent Processing Times Subject to Release Dates.

Single Machine Common Due Window Scheduling With Controllable Job Processing Times

A Model for Minimizing Active Processor Time

Single Machine Scheduling Proportionally Deteriorating Jobs with Ready Times Subject to the Total Weighted Completion Time Minimization

Just-in-time single-batch-processing machine scheduling

Scheduling to Tradeoff Between the Number and the Length of Accepted Jobs.

A Class of On-Line Scheduling Algorithms to Minimize Total Completion Time.

Single-Machine Scheduling With Decreasing Time-Dependent Processing Times To Minimize Total Absolute Differences In Waiting Times

Single machine batch scheduling problem with family setup times and release dates to minimize makespan

Group Scheduling and Due Date Assignment Without Restriction on a Single Machine