Comparison of Two Approaches in Surgical Treatment of Condylar Fractures

MENG Zhi-bing,LV Chun-tang,ZHOU Zhong-hua,GUO Jun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-4979.2007.02.011
IF: 1.9
2007-01-01
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Abstract:Objective: To compare the curative effects of two different approaches in the surgical treatment of condylar fracture. Methods: 33 patients (43 sides) with condylar fractures were treated at our department. 17 sides of condylar fractures adapted an approach of improved submandibular incision while the 26 sides of condylar fractures were treated in the approach of preauricular incision. All cases were followed up for 12~24 months. Results: All the wounds healed with first intention. No case complicated with ankylosis. The facial contour were fine in all cases. In those cases improved submandibular incisions, 45% showed a lateral movement restriction; while only 14% manfesteda lateral restuction in preauricular incision cases. As to the incidence rate of temporary facial palsy and TMJ pain, in cases of preauricular incision showed higher than those of submandibular incision. Conclusion: Each treatment approach has its own advantages and disadvantages. The appropiete one should be selected according to the special situation of patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?