Abstract:Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of tarsal sinus approach and lateral L-shape approach in the treatment of Sanders type Ⅲ calcaneal fracture.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was used to analyze 32 patients with Sanders type Ⅲ calcaneal fracture from January 2013-June 2016, Patients were divided into minimally invasive group or incision group, of which 17 cases in the minimally invasive group used tarsal sinus approach and 15 cases in the incision group used lateral widened "L" approach, The general data of the two groups, the time from injury to surgery, operation time, postoperative drainage, B?hler angle and Gissane angle before and after surgery, postoperative complications, and the ankle-hind foot score of the American orthopaedic foot and ankle society (AOFAS) were recorded, and the results were compared.Results:All included patients were followed, and the mean follow-up time in the minimally invasive group and the incision group was (18.3±2.6) months and (19.6±3.3) months, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). At the last follow-up visit, the AOFAS score in the minimally invasive group was (88.2±8.5) and the incision group was (87.4±11.2), and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05), and 1 case in the minimally invasive group and 3 cases in the incision group developed different degrees of subtalar arthritis. There was no significant comparison between the two groups (P>0.05). Analysis of variance by repeated measurement design of incisional group and minimally invasive group of B?hler angle, There was no significant difference between different groups (F=0.010, P=0.921), there was significant difference between different time points (F=92.201, P=0.000), and there was no interaction between groups and time points (F=0.166, P=0.848). Analysis of variance by repeated measurement design of incisional and minimally invasive groups of Gissane angles, There was no significant difference between different groups (F=0.012, P=0.912), there was significant difference between different time points (F=88.800, P=0.000), and there was no interaction between groups and time points (F=0.500, P=0.060). The Gissane angle of B?hler's angle was significantly improved in the minimally invasive group and the incision group at the last follow-up 1 day after surgery compared with the preoperative Gissane Angle, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The postoperative drainage was (30.5±19.3) ml in the minimally invasive group and (150.4±41.2) ml in the incisional group, the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). And one patient in the minimally invasive group had difficulty in repositioning the ankle by extending 2-3 cm from under the tip of the outer ankle to the posterior lower arc, the incision complications of the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion:No significant was found between the two groups in imaging restoration and functional recovery for Sanders type Ⅲ calcaneal fracture, but minimal invasive can significantly reduce early complications after operation.

Effective Comparison Between Improved Lateral Incision and the Traditional L-shaped Extension Incision in Treatment of Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures

Open reduction and internal fixation of intra-articular calcaneal fracture:26 cases report

Treatment of Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures with or Without Bone Graft

Oblique Lateral Incision Versus L-shaped Lateral Incision for the Calcaneal Fracture Treatment

Theoretical and Clinical Investigation of Incision with Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures Involved in Calcaneocuboid Joint

Treatment of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures with or without bone grafts: A systematic review of the literature

The clinical outcomes comparison of limited open reduction via a sinus tarsi approach and open reduction internal fixation via a lateral extensile L-shape incision for the treatment of Sanders type Ⅱ calcaneal fracture

Treatment Of The Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures: An Efficacy Comparison Among Closed Percutaneous Reduction Surgery, Open Reduction Via Extended L-Shaped Lateral Approach And Small Sinus Tarsi Approach

Efficacy of three approaches for fractures of calcaneus:percutaneous reduction surgery, L-shaped lateral approach and small sinus tarsi approach

Comparison of small incision mini locking plate fixation with traditional incision plate internal fixation in treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fracture

Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures

Less Wound Complications of A Sinus Tarsi Approach Compared to an Extended Lateral Approach for the Treatment of Displaced Intraarticular Calcaneal Fracture: A Randomized Clinical Trial in 64 Patients

Comparison of Two Surgical Approaches for Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures: the Modified Sinus Tarsi Approach Versus the Extensile Lateral Approach

Importance of Assistant Intra-Operative Medial Distraction Technique for Intraarticular Calcaneus Fractures.

Therapeutic effect of tarsal sinus approach and lateral L approach on Sanders calcaneal fracture

Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Operative Versus Non-operative Treatment of Displaced Intra-articular Calcaneal Fractures

[Comparative study on curative effect of minimally invasive locking plate for the treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures via sinus tarsi approach]

Clinical Studies of Small Incision Mini Locking Fixation Combined with Traditional Chinese Medicine in Treatment of Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures

Less wound complications of a sinus tarsi approach compared to an extended lateral approach for the treatment of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fracture

[Surgical treatment for intra-articular calcaneal fractures].