Abstract:Background: Flexor-tendon injury is a historically challenging problem for orthopaedic surgeons. Much research has been dedicated to finding solutions that offer balance in terms of the strength and ease of the repair versus the rate of complications such as adhesions. The number of core sutures, distance from the tendon edge, and use of an epitendinous stitch have been shown to affect repair strength1-4. A number of configurations have been described for the placement of the suture; however, none has been identified as a clear gold standard5. This article will highlight the preferred tendon repair technique of the senior author (R.J.S.), the Strickland repair with a simple running epitendinous stitch. Relevant anatomy, indications, operative technique, and postoperative management will be discussed. Description: The flexor tendon is typically accessed via extension of the laceration that caused the initial injury. After the neurovascular structures and pulleys are assessed, the tendon is cleaned and prepared for repair. A 3-0 braided nylon suture is utilized for the 4-core strand repair and placed in the Strickland fashion. A 5-0 polypropylene suture is then utilized for the simple running epitendinous stitch. Alternatives: Multiple alternative techniques have been described. These vary in the number of core strands, the repair configuration, the suture caliber, and the use of an epitendinous or other suture. Nonoperative treatment is typically reserved for partial flexor-tendon laceration, as complete tendon discontinuity will not heal and requires surgical intervention. Rationale: The 4-core strand configuration has been well established to increase the strength of the repair as compared with 2-core strand configurations, while also being easier to accomplish and with less suture burden than other techniques1. The presently described technique has excellent repair strength and can allow for early active range of motion, which is critical to reduce the risk of postoperative adhesions and stiffness. Expected outcomes: Excellent outcomes have been demonstrated for primary flexor-tendon repair if performed soon after the injury1,2,6,7. Delayed repair may lead to adhesions and poor tendon healing8. Early postoperative rehabilitation is vital for success9. There are advocates for either active or passive protocols10-12. The protocol at our institution is to begin early active place-and-hold therapy at 3 to 5 days postoperatively, which has been shown in the literature to provide improved finger motion as compared with passive-motion therapy13-16.Important Tips:: The proximal end of the tendon may need to be retrieved via a separate incision if it is not accessible through the flexor-tendon sheath.The proximal end of the tendon may be held in place with a 25-gauge needle in order to best place sutures into both ends of the tendon.The epitendinous suture is run around the back wall before the core sutures are tied down, in order to prevent the tendon and repair from bunching up and becoming overly bulky.The entire A4 pulley and the distal A2 pulley can be divided for exposure if necessary.Up to 2 cm of the flexor-tendon sheath can be divided.If there are concomitant digital nerve injuries, repair these after the tendon, in order to avoid damaging the more delicate nerve repair while manipulating the tendon for repair.The most common major complications following tendon repair are formation of adhesions and rerupture. Acronyms and Abbreviations:: FDS = flexor digitorum superficialisFDP = flexor digitorum profundusMCP = metacarpophalangealPIP = proximal interphalangealDIP = distal interphalangeal.

Effects of Tension Direction on Strength of Tendon Repair.

The effect of the number of strands and knot throws of core suture techniques on the mechanical properties of the repaired flexor tendon

Influence of Core Suture Purchase Length on Strength of Four-Strand Tendon Repairs

The Changes of Tensile Strength and Ultimate Work at the Early Period of Flexor Tendon Repair:An Experimental Study

Core Suture Purchase Affects Strength of Tendon Repairs

[Biomechanical Study of Flexor Tendon Repair in an in Vivo Curvature Model].

Biomechanical Changes in the Early Period of Flexor Tendon Repair:An Experimental Study

Re: Brockardt CJ, Sullivan LG, Watkins BE Et Al. Evaluation of Simple and Looped Suture and New Material for Flexor Tendon Repair. J Hand Surg Eur. 2009, 34: 329–32

Implications in Surgical Practice and Early Active Mobilization

Strength of Tendon Repair Decreases in the Presence of an Intact A2 Pulley: Biomechanical Study in a Chicken Model.

The Learning Curves of Adelaide- and Gan-Modified Lim-Tsai Flexor Tendon Repair Techniques

Biomechanical Analysis of a New Odd-Numbered Strand Suture Technique for Early Active Mobilization After Primary Flexor Tendon Repair

Biomechanical analysis of cadaver rabbit Achilles tendons after full transection and suture: Comparison of U-Tang 4-strand with the cross-locked version of U-Tang 4-strand suture technique

Outcomes of the six-strand M-Tang repair for zone 2 primary flexor tendon repair in 54 fingers

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Different Immobilized Finger Positions After Repair of Flexor Tendon Rupture in Zones I and II: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial With Historical Control Group

Flexor Tendon Zone II Repair

Maximum Bridging Suture Tension Provides Better Clinical Outcomes in Transosseous-Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair: A Clinical, Prospective Randomized Comparative Study

Reduction of Grip Strength, Finger Flexion Pressure, Finger Pinch Pressure and Key Pinch Following Flexor Tendon Repair

Robust thumb flexor tendon repairs with a six-strand M-Tang method, pulley venting, and early active motion

Effect of the Varying Load of Vastus Medialis Oblique on the Tensile Stress at the Proximal Insertion of Patellar Tendon—An Experimental Biomechanical Study

Tendon Inversion Improves Tendon-to-Bone Healing in a Rat Bicep Tenodesis Model