Abstract:We read with interest this paper about the use of simple and looped sutures in repairing tendons in an experimental setting. The authors found that their method B (a four-strand Kessler repair, using the needle leading double strands) did not provide the strength as much as their method C (the double Kessler repair, using the needle leading one strand). Based on this finding, they considered that the looped suture does not provide the same strength as two separate throws; the authors pointed out that these appear different from the findings of Cao and Tang (2005) using a looped suture for a modified Tang repair. We have tried to read the details of how they tied the knots, and whether they incorporated any locking anchors into the tendon–suture junction. We found no clear information about how the knots were made in the text, except in the drawings in Fig 1. We saw no locking anchors to the tendons based on the suture’s loop design. It appears to us that in method B, the authors led two strands which were looped together through the tendon, without taking advantages of the suture’s loops to lock the tendon substance. If this is true, the authors’ repair could be achieved just as easily by using a single needle attached to two independent, rather than looped, strands. The advantages of the loop have not been utilized for making tendon–suture junctions. In other words, the suture’s loop design is not essential for that repair method. One needle carrying two independent strands can accomplish the same repair. Our experience with looped sutures is that their advantage is in the ability to lock anchors to the tendon, and the possibility of leading two strands into the tendon at one pass (Cao and Tang, 2005; Tang 2007). The greater holding power is generated by their locking junctions with the tendon. We have used the needle carrying two independent strands in repairing the tendons, achieving a repair configuration identical to the method B and reported at the 10th IFSSH meeting in 2007. In comparing a four-strand Tang method using a looped suture, and incorporating the locking anchors, a method of four-strand Kessler repair (using one needle carrying two independent strands), and a double Kessler method, we found that the four-strand Kessler repair was weaker than the other two. Our and the authors’ reports actually present similar findings – without this locking type of tendon–suture junction using the loop, the repair using one needle carrying two strands is weak, regardless of the four strands across the repair site. The four-strand Kessler repair, achieved both in our report and in the study of Brockardt et al. (2009), differs distinctly from the four-strand Tang and double Kessler methods in biomechanical properties. The findings – by the authors regarding a repair without taking advantage of the essential merits of a loop suture – cannot be extrapolated to those methods that were accomplished with locking anchors in the tendon–suture junctions using the loops, a key component of the repair to repair strength.

Re: Brockardt CJ, Sullivan LG, Watkins BE Et Al. Evaluation of Simple and Looped Suture and New Material for Flexor Tendon Repair. J Hand Surg Eur. 2009, 34: 329–32

The effect of the number of strands and knot throws of core suture techniques on the mechanical properties of the repaired flexor tendon

Implications in Surgical Practice and Early Active Mobilization

Arthroscopic Soft Tissue Tenodesis Versus Bony Fixation Anchor Tenodesis of the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon

Influence of Core Suture Purchase Length on Strength of Four-Strand Tendon Repairs

Biomechanical analysis of cadaver rabbit Achilles tendons after full transection and suture: Comparison of U-Tang 4-strand with the cross-locked version of U-Tang 4-strand suture technique

Can a Two Simple Stitches Method Provide Secure Fixation Strength in Biceps Tenodesis?: Biomechanical Evaluation of Various Suture Techniques

Core Suture Purchase Affects Strength of Tendon Repairs

Anatomic Knot Suture Anchor Versus Knotless Suture Anchor Technique for Anterior Talofibular Ligament Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison

Biomechanical Comparison of Knotless Suture Anchor Versus Percutaneous End-to-End Technique for Mid-Substance Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair

Biomechanical Analysis of Zone 2 Flexor Tendon Repair With a Coupler Device Versus Locking Cruciate Core Suture

Biomechanical Analysis of a New Odd-Numbered Strand Suture Technique for Early Active Mobilization After Primary Flexor Tendon Repair

Biomechanical Changes in the Early Period of Flexor Tendon Repair:An Experimental Study

Strength of suture anchor versus transosseous tunnel in anatomic reconstruction of the ankle lateral ligaments: a biomechanical study.

Effects of Tension Direction on Strength of Tendon Repair.

[Biomechanical Study of Flexor Tendon Repair in an in Vivo Curvature Model].

H-loop Knotless Double-Row Repair Versus Knotted Suture Bridge for Rotator Cuff Tears: A Biomechanical and Histological Study in an Animal Model

Optimal Suturing Techniques in Patch-Bridging Reconstruction for Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Finite Element Analysis

A Modified Mason-Allen Suture Enhancement Technique (Sunglasses Loop) for Single-Row Repair of Medium-to-Large Rotator Cuffs

The Learning Curves of Adelaide- and Gan-Modified Lim-Tsai Flexor Tendon Repair Techniques

H-Loop Knotless Double-Row Repair Versus Krackow Repair for Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Biomechanical Study in a Cadaveric Model