Abstract:The utilitarian philosopher is one of the most important theorists of liberalism, and his ideas still cast a long shadow over contemporary debates. This chapter provides an overview of Mill’s argument for a liberal approach to speech and the conditions of knowledge acquisition. All knowledge claims are ultimately based on inductions from experience which are constantly exposed to falsification and review. To facilitate the growth of knowledge Mill argues for broad freedom of speech, discussion and publication, and consequently, he rejects censorship in the face of conventional opinion. Mill extends this right even to a positive duty to protect error as an epistemic basis for testing new beliefs and our appreciation of them. His privileging of error and unpopular opinion is central to his defence of the constitution of a liberal democratic state where he acknowledges both the educative function of democratic deliberation and argument but also the requirement to challenge the claims and limit the powers of governing elites. However, whilst his domestic politics is open, progressive and enlightened this does not extend to the international domain where his defence of imperialism and his views of ‘backward’ civilisations suggest an attitude far less tolerant of diversity or error when it is found in non-European cultures and civilisations. This chapter provides an overview of John Stuart Mill’s argument for a liberal approach to speech and the conditions of knowledge acquisition. All knowledge claims are ultimately based on inductions from experience which are constantly exposed to falsification and review. Mill followed in the empiricist tradition of Locke, Hume and Hartley basing all knowledge on sense perception and the formation of ideas in mental reflection on sensory experiences. Sense perception is the source of impressions from which simple ideas are derived; these ideas are combined in accordance with ‘associationist’ principles to arrive at more complex ideas which form the basis of reasoning and belief formation. The threat of populism and the importance of epistemic elites or experts come together in Mill’s complex institutional political theory inConsiderations on Representative Government. Democracy seems to suggest that everyone is an expert of the relevant kind, but Mill found that idea highly implausible.

John Stuart Mill,An Initiator of Positivism as a Research Method of Social Sciences

The Methodological Foundation of Experiments in Economics:Beyond "Innocuous Falsificationism"

Understanding Adam Smith:From the Perspective of Ethics

Evolution of the Concept of “Personal”and the Spirit of the Age——From“the Abstract Person”to“Realistic Individual”and “Civil Society”

Positivist Research Method on Economic Law and Its Application

The Discussions of Positivism and Interpretivism

From Political Liberty to Social Liberty——An Essay on J.S.Mill's Liberal Thought

Standardization of Positivism: Significant Way to Improve LIS Research

The Theory and Method Discussion of Social History in New Period

John Stuart Mill, Socialiste

The Pure Sociology:The Scientific Revolution of Sociology and Its Paradigm Building——The Methodology and Theoretical Logic of Donald Black

The influence of philosophy of science on methodology of economics

Assessment of the Development of Chinese Sociological Positivism

Durkheim's Methodology of Social Sciences and Educational Research

On the Internal and External Debates of Positivist IR Research

Mill, liberalism, and epistemic diversity

Establishing Representative Government——Theory Origin of John Mill's Idea of Constitutionalism

A Primary Investigation on the Application of Natural Science Method to the Field of Social Science

Scientific Method Is Rooted in Scientific Spirit & Literacy:Three Persons’ Discussions on Research Methods of Library Science

Making Quantitative Research Work: From Positivist Dogma to Actual Social Scientific Inquiry

Enlightenment of Mill's Liberal Thinking on Chinese Constitutional Construction