Abstract:With regard to the relation between individuality and sociality, there is a widely shared opinion about Durkheimian sociology,which defines it as holism and social determinism,and thus believes that it denies necessarily the individuality of any member of any society. In this paper,the author tries to prove that the opinion in question is inaccurate. For this purpose,three main arguments of that opinion are examined,which are all related to Durkheim's own writings. 1) Holist sociology denies the individuality ontologically speaking. 2) It finds in objective functions the genuine explanations of social phenomena, and therefore denies that individual elements (for instance intentions) could be decisive for actions. 3) It considers the political project which is based on social contract impossible. These arguments rely on two implicit conceptual premises. 1) If sociality is to be understood in a realistic sense,it must be understood as an organism. 2) Individuality relies either on physical auto-sufficiency or on moral autonomy. Both of the premises restrict the concept of"whole"and"individual". After giving account to the popular opinion,the author is to argue over its inaccuracy by showing how Durkheimian sociology has developed. First, Durkheim has made an important concept out of"institution,"in the specific sense that he defined. It meets the requirement of the holism without falling into the organic approach, and it plays a central role in the Durkheimian sociology in broad sense. Second,Mauss and Dumont have made important sociological categories out of"person"and"individual,"which subsequently prove to be specifically modern institutions. As a result, individuality no more appears to be in conflict with sociality,but turns out to be a specific way through which sociality is realized.

Durkheim's Methodology of Social Sciences and Educational Research

Change of the Durkheim's Sociology Method from the Positivism to Dialectics

PERSPEKTIF TEORI SOSIAL EMILE DURKHEIM DALAM SOSIOLOGI PENDIDIKAN

On Bourdieu's Sociological Methodology and Its Enlightenment to Educational Research

Durkheim and the Sociology of Education in Britain

The Religious Sociology of Durkheim

What Are the Social Studies of Science?

Social Factors in E. Durkheim's Theory

Durkheim Revisited:The social construction of morals in the modern economy

A sociohistorical examination of George Herbert Mead's approach to science education

Another Critique of Modernity:The Relation Between Individuality and Sociality in Durkheimian Sociology

Practical Science of Education

Analysis of Erickson's Education Research Theory Under the Interpretivism Paradigm

Social Solidarity,Collective Consciousness and Punishment:A Study on Durkheim's Sociology of Punishment

John Stuart Mill,An Initiator of Positivism as a Research Method of Social Sciences

Language and imagined Gesellschaft: Émile Durkheim's civil-linguistic nationalism and the consequences of universal human ideals

The study on the core concepts of contemporary sociology of education and its theoretical construction

Methods and Paths:Methodological Thinking on Discipline Development of Postgraduate Pedagogy

Living One’s Theories: Moral Consistency in the Life of Émile Durkheim

Otis Dudley Duncan ’ S Legacy : the Demographic Approach to Quantitative Reasoning in Social Science

Émile Durkheim e o Estado