Harper-dorn creep in polycrystalline ferrite, beryllia, alumina, calcite and olivine

Jian N Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-716X(94)90404-9

1994-01-01

Scripta Metallurgica et Materialia

Abstract:The fundamental mechanism of time-dependent plasticity, or creep, of crystalline materials at very low stress is, at present, particularly controversial. At “moderate” stresses above about 0.6 Tm, over a wide range of stresses, five-power-law creep is observed that is widely believed to be dislocation climb-controlled, with the activation energy for creep to be close to that of vacancy diffusion. Steady-state creep (Stage II or secondary creep) is usually described by the steady-state stress exponent, n, which is typically 4–7. At lower stresses, Harper–Dorn has usually been the mechanism suggested to occur. The relation between the applied stress and the steady-state creep-rate for Harper–Dorn creep is phenomenologically described bywhere AHD is a constant. Since these early observations, Harper–Dorn creep has been reported to occur in many materials. Recent observations have suggested that in Al (the most extensively studied system) and all other systems, Harper–Dorn may be artificial in that the high creep rates may be a consequence of additional or unusual restoration mechanisms that do not normally occur in five-power-law creep or tensile fracture. These restoration mechanisms include dynamic recrystallization and/or grain growth. Others have suggested that Harper–Dorn is also artificial but because the strain-rates reported were not genuinely steady-state and, consequently, as much as an order of magnitude higher than genuine steady-state behavior. Others also found that they could not reproduce the original Al data of Harper and Dorn, for unknown reasons. The analysis of other materials in which Harper–Dorn has been proposed to occur has been placed in question.