Different B-Value Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Differential Diagnosis of Upper Urinary Tract Cancer and Non-Specific Inflamation

WU Guang-yu,LU Qing,XU Jian-rong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2012.06.009
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the value of ADC derived from different b-value diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI) in differentiating upper urinary tract cancer and non-specific inflamation.Materials and Methods:Twenty four patients with upper urinary tract tumor(malignant group) and 14 patients with non-specific inflamation(inflamation group) underwent DWI with different b value on a 3 T MR imaging scanner.The ADC values and SNR among different b factors were measured respectively and analyzed statistically,ADC value of upper urinary tract cancer and non-specific inflamation was compared using Mann-Whitney U test,ADC value derived from different b value was compared using Friedman analysis and SNR of DWI with different b value was compared using ANOVA test.Results:When ADC was derived from DWI with b value of 500,1000,1500,2000 s/mm2,the mean ADC value of malignant group was(1.70±0.40),(1.46±0.36,(1.21±0.28),(1.04±0.21)×10-3 mm2/s,the mean ADC value of inflamation group was(2.47±0.83),(1.99±0.49),(1.76±0.43),(1.49±0.36)×10-3 mm2/s.An increase in b-value was associated with a decrease in ADC value in upper urinary tract cancer as well as in non-specific inflamation.The ADC value of upper urinary tract cancer was significantly lower than that of non-specific inflamation.The result of ROC analysis shows the differential abilitiy of b=1500,2000 s/mm2 was significantly higher than b=500,1000 s/mm2 and there was no obvious different both in b=2000 vs b=1500 s/mm2 and b=1000 vs b=500 s/mm2.The SNR of DWI was decreased with the increasing of b value.The most optimal b-value in dfferential diagnosis was observed with b=1500 s/mm2,the cut off value was 1.42×10-3 mm2/s,the sensitivity of differential diagnosis was 78.6% and the specificity was 79.2%.Conclusion:DWI with b=1500 s/mm2 is of promising value in differential diagnosis of upper urinary tract cancer and non-specific inflammation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?