Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire

刘思斯,甘怡群

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2010.06.021

2010-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To introduce the Meaning in Life Questionnaire(MLQ)developed by Steger et al,and to examine its reliability and validity in Chinese college students.Methods:Totally 307 students from Peking University completed a battery of structured questionnaires.Part of the data randomly selected(n=150)was conducted Exploratory Factor Analysis and the other(n=157)was used in Confirmatory Factor Analysis.The Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale(MCSD),Future-oriented Coping Inventory(FCI),Positive and Negative Affect Scale(PANAS),Self-Rating Depression Scale(SDS),Self-Esteem Scale(SES)and General Well-Being Schedule(GWB)were used to test the criterion validity of the MLQ.Results:(1)Exploratory Factor Analysis supported a 2-factor structure which consisted of Presence of meaning(MLQ-P)and Search for meaning(MLQ-S),and their cumulative contribution rate was 57.22%.The range of factor loading was between 0.579 and 0.829.Confirmatory Factor Analysis confirmed the hypothesized 2-factor model(χ2=43.81,P<0.05;GFI=0.94,AGFI=0.90,NFI=0.93,CFI=0.97,IFI=0.97,RMSEA=0.066).(2)The internal consistencies were good for the overall scale(Cronbach' s alpha=0.71)and the subscales(Cronbach' s alpha=0.81 and 0.72,respectively).(3)MLQ-P score was positively correlated with SES,GWB,positive affect,proactive coping,preventive coping and MCSD(r=0.19~0.59,Ps<0.01),while negatively correlated with SDS and Negative Affect(r=-0.50,-0.18,Ps<0.01).MLQ-S had positive correlations with positive affect,proactive coping and positive affect(r=0.20,0.31,and 0.15,Ps<0.01).Conclusion:The Chinese version of MLQ is reliable and valid for application in China.