Mathematical Methods of Geography: from Quantitative Analysis to GeoComputation

CHEN Yan-guang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-1190.2005.01.036
2005-01-01
Abstract:This paper is devoted to reconsidering the past, present, and future of geography. General geography consists of mathematical geography and statistical geography. The former corresponds to geography while the latter to geography in a sense. Where narrow sense is concerned, quantitative was concluded as early as 1960s; but where broad sense is concerned, theoretical of geography is pending. The mathematics applied to geographical research has two functions: One is to be employed as a tool of sorting out the data; the other is to constitute assumptions and then build models for developing theories. The latter is much more important than the former, and a mathematical model itself is much more significant than the insights from data. The introduction of post-modern mathematics of chaos and fractals, together with bionic mathematical series such as cellular automata, neural nets, genetic algorithms, and even artificial life, etc., has marked an epoch in methods of geography. The classical geography and burgeoning geo-computation (GC) have reached the same goal by different routes, and GC can be regarded as a continual revolution of GIS and geography.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?