On the Building and Selection Criteria of Models in Geography:Impacts of Non-Euclidean Geometry on Geographic Methodology

陈彦光
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-7105.2008.04.001
2008-01-01
Abstract:Since non-Euclidean geometry came into being,the main task of science has shifted from seeking truth to building models.Taking this circumstance into account,the principal scientific tasks of geography should be adjusted accordingly.Like what has ever happened in other disciplines,the geographical science nowadays does not try to find ultimate truth,rather,it would mainly focus on the creation of models,especially mathematical ones.Generally speaking,mathematical modeling can have two major aims,explanation and prediction,which are the main functions of science.The author holds that one of major standards to judge a good or bad model lies in the model's ability of explanation and prediction in the real world rather than in that a model's preconditions strictly accord with reality.Actually,the Occam's Razor Principle can be employed to build and judge geographical models and the criteria of choosing them can be boiled down to structural principle and functional principle.The first principle means that when two models have similar explanation or prediction capability,the model with less postulates and parameters would be more advisable.And the second one indicates that when the number of postulates and parameters is identical,the model with greater explanation and prediction power would be considered superior to the other one.In addition,it is really a worthy attempt for geographers to build models that can not only describe geographical phenomena but also have potential to be applied to other related fields.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?