Abstract:Problem definition: Project outsourcing has been a pronounced trend in many industries but is also recognized as a major cause for project delays. We study how companies can coordinate outsourced projects with uncertain completion times through bilateral contract negotiations. Academic/practical relevance: Misaligned subcontractor incentives may result in substantial losses to both project clients and subcontractors. Coordinating subcontractors’ efforts through proper contracts is imperative to the success of project outsourcing. Most previous studies on project contracting have not addressed subcontractors’ bargaining powers or the dynamic bargaining process in negotiations. We fill in this gap by studying bilateral bargaining between the client and subcontractors, which better reflects real-world negotiations. Methodology: We model project contract negotiations as a multiunit bilateral bargaining game. We derive the conditions such that bilateral negotiations can achieve system coordination and characterize the equilibrium negotiation outcomes. We then compare the conditions and equilibria under various model settings to study their impact on project contracting. Results: Our study uncovers how the coordination of project outsourcing is impacted by the contract form, bargaining power structure, precedence network topology, payment timing, external opportunities, and negotiation protocols. For single-task projects, the widely used fixed-price (cost-plus) contract can achieve system coordination only when the subcontractor (client) possesses full bargaining power. Cost-sharing and time-based incentive contracts, which perform well for single-task projects, may not be effective for projects with parallel tasks when any subcontractor’s bargaining power is sufficiently high. Projects with serial tasks can be coordinated only under certain extreme bargaining power structures. Delaying payments always exacerbates the incentive misalignment. Managerial implications: Our analysis provides insights and guidelines to companies regarding how to select proper contract forms and payment timing schemes, based on the characteristics of the projects and subcontractors, to ensure the effectiveness of project outsourcing. Our results also highlight the importance of bargaining modeling in project contracting.

Reliability of Coordination in Financial Bargaining and the Alleviation of Frangibility in Financial System

Coordination of a Risk-averse Supply Chain with Price Competition

Supply Chain Coordination with Service Level Constraint

Supply Chain Coordination under Asymmetric Risk Aversion Information

The Study Between Shadow Banking and Financial Fragility in China: an Empirical Analysis Based on the Co-Integration Test and Error Correction Model

Coordination Frictions and the Financial Crisis

Research on Buy-Back Contract for Supply Chain Coordination with Prospect Theory

Financial Transaction Between Banks and Enterprise:Asymmetrical Information and Countermeasures

Coordination and Conservatism

Supply chain coordination with risk aversion retailers

Supply Chain Coordination with Competion Between Multiple Risk Aversion Retailers

Theoretical Analysis on the Imbalance of International Cooperation in Financial supervision and Regulatory Arbitrage

Robust Consensus Modeling: Concerning Consensus Fairness and Efficiency with Uncertain Costs

Risk Allocation in a Coordinated Supply Chain System

The Coordination of a Capital-Constrained Supply Chain with a Risk-Averse Retailer

The Framework and the Architecture in the Study of Asian Financial Cooperation

A supply chain coordination mechanism with suppliers’ effort performance level and fairness concern

Financial Contracts,Allocation of Decision Rights and Managerial Incentive

Coordinating Project Outsourcing Through Bilateral Contract Negotiations

Research on the Relations between Capital Configuration and Intensity of Market Competition Under the condition of Entrusted Agency

Allocation Mechanisms in Decentralized Exchange Markets with Frictions